期刊文献+

基于语言学特征的小学生作文流畅性自动评价 被引量:5

Research on Automatic Evaluation of the Fluency of Elementary School Students’ Composition Based on Linguistic Features
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于作文自动评价的研究思路,采用机器学习的方法对小学生作文流畅性进行自动评价。首先,从作文的总篇、段落、句子、短语、词汇和语法错误层面分析并抽取了一系列能够反映作文流畅性的语言学计量特征;其次,基于逻辑回归、决策树和支持向量机三种经典模型以及逻辑模型树、SimpleLogistic和随机子空间三种集成模型,训练了六个流畅性分类器进行实验。实验结果表明,文中选取的17个特征项对于作文流畅性具有较好的区分度,训练的模型能够根据流畅程度对作文进行较为准确的分类,集成了逻辑回归和决策树模型的SimpleLogistic分类器表现最佳,其分类准确率达到了85.2%。 Based on the research ideas of automatic evaluation of composition,machine learning method is used to evaluate the fluency of elementary students’composition automatically.Firstly,a series of linguistic econometric features that can reflect the fluency of composition are analyzed and extracted from the total essay,paragraph,sentence,phrase,vocabulary and grammatical errors.Secondly,based on three classical models of logistic regression,decision tree and SMO and three integrated models of LMT,SimpleLogistic and RSM,six fluency classifiers were trained.The experimental results show that the 17 feature items selected have a good distinction for composition fluency,and the trained model can classify the composition accurately according to the fluency.The SimpleLogistic classifier with integrated logistic regression and decision tree model performs best,and itsclassification accuracy rate reached 85.2%.
作者 吴恩慈 田俊华 Wu Enci;Tian Junhua
出处 《教育测量与评价》 2020年第3期41-50,64,共11页 Educational Measurement and Evaluation
基金 江苏省高校优势学科建设工程(PAPD)资助项目“南京师范大学教育学优势学科”研究成果
关键词 作文流畅性 作文自动评价 语言学特征 the fluency of composition automatic evaluation of composition linguistic features
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献20

  • 1邢福义.汉语复句与单句的对立和纠结[J].世界汉语教学,1993,7(1):11-19. 被引量:36
  • 2邢福义.小句中枢说[J].中国语文,1995(6):420-428. 被引量:157
  • 3邢福义.现代汉语复句问题之研究[J].黄冈师专学报,1994,14(2):3-11. 被引量:5
  • 4王力.《中国现代语法》[M].商务印书馆,2000..
  • 5Halleck, B. Gene 1995 Assessing oral proficiency: A comparison of holistic and objective measures. The Modern Language Journal 79(2) : 223--234.
  • 6Hunt, W. Kellogg 1965 Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report No. 3. Champaign, IL, USA:NCTE. 20.
  • 7Hunt, W. Kellogg 1970 Recent measures in syntactic development. In Mark Lester (ed.) Readings in Ap- plied Transformational Grammar, 187--200. Holt: Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
  • 8Hunt, W. Kellogg 1976 Study correlates age with grammatical complexity. Linguistic Reporter 18(7) : 3.
  • 9Hunt, W. Kellogg 1977 Early blooming and late blooming syntactic structures. In Charles R. Cooper & Lee Odell (eds.) Evaluative Writing: Describing, Measuring, Judging. National Council of Teachers of English.
  • 10Iwashita, Noriko 2006 Syntactic complexity measures and their relation to oral proficiency in Japanese as a foreign language. Language Assessment Quarterly 3(2) : 151--169.

共引文献23

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部