期刊文献+

基于抽样调查的区域沟蚀强度评价--以东北地区为例 被引量:1

Evaluation on Regional Gully Erosion Intensity Based on Sampling Survey
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选择东北地区地貌类型不同的4个典型县(旗),即辽宁省辽阳县和彰武县、黑龙江省嫩江县,以及内蒙古阿荣旗,基于分层不等概系统空间抽样方法抽取112个野外调查单元,进行浅沟和切沟调查和沟蚀强度评价,并比较了各指标评价沟蚀强度的特点。结果表明,东北黑土区浅沟和切沟发生频率都较高,沟长<100 m的以浅沟为主,100~200 m的浅沟和切沟数量相当,>200 m的以切沟为主。根据东北黑土区沟蚀强度判断标准,采用沟壑密度判断的沟蚀强度明显高于采用沟谷面积比判断的沟蚀强度;根据沟壑密度和沟数密度、沟谷面积比的关系建立回归方程,得到沟数密度及调整后的沟谷面积比标准;根据上述结论,建议将沟数密度增加至东北黑土区沟蚀强度判断标准,采用单指标时用沟壑密度或者沟数密度,采用双指标时在单指标的基础上再增加沟谷面积比,还可以三个指标同时使用,沟蚀强度以各指标判断强度高者为准。采用沟壑密度和修正后的沟谷面积比判断4个典型县(旗)沟蚀强度,平均沟蚀强度为强烈,其中辽宁省辽阳县、彰武县和黑龙江省嫩江县沟蚀强度为中度,内蒙古阿荣旗沟蚀强度为剧烈。
出处 《中国水土保持》 2020年第1期56-59,I0003,共5页 Soil and Water Conservation in China
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0507006) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41371271)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Jeffery G J. The national resources inventory and its role in US agricuhure [ C ]//Agricultural Statistics 2000 : Proceedings of the conference on agricultural statistics organized by the Na- tional Agricultural Statistics Service of the US Department of Agriculture, under the auspices of the International Statistical Institute, 1995 : 181 - 192.
  • 2U S Department of Agriculture. Summary report: 2007 nation- al resources inventory [ R ]. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC,and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 2009.
  • 3Lu H, Gallant J, Prosser I P, et al. Prediction of sheet and rill erosion over the Australian continent, incorporating monthly soil loss distribution [ R ]. CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report ,2001.
  • 4Grimm M, Jones R, Montanarella L. Soil erosion risk in Europe [R]. European Commission, Joint Research Center, Institute for Environment & Sustainability ,European Soil Bureau ,2002.
  • 5Liu B Y,Zhang K L, Xie Y . An empirical soil loss equation [ C ]//Proceedings-Process of soil erosion and its environment effect,12th international soil conservation organization confer- ence ,Tsinghua University Press, Beijing,2002:21 - 25.
  • 6Wischmeier W H, Mannering J V. Relation of soil properties to its erodibility [ J ]. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 1969,33 (1) : 131 - 137.
  • 7Sharpley A N, Williams J R, Jones C A, Dyke P T. Erosion productivity impact calculator EPIC: model documentation [ R]. USDA Technical bul|etin 1765,1990.
  • 8Foster G R, Wischmeier W H. Evaluating irregular slopes for soil loss prediction [ J ]. Transaction of American Society of Agriculture Engineers, 1974( 17 ) :305 - 309.
  • 9Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion los- ses-A guide to conservation planning[ R]. U S Department of Agriculture, Agricultural handbook ( No. 537 ). Washington, D C, 1978.
  • 10Liu B Y, Nearing M A , Risse L M. Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes [ J ]. Transaction of American Socie- ty of Agriculture Engineers, 1974,37 (6) : 1835 - 1842.

共引文献83

同被引文献21

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部