期刊文献+

重污染行业上市公司生态创新调查与分析 被引量:1

Investigation and Analysis on Eco-innovation of Listed Firms in Heavy Pollution Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以我国879家重污染行业上市公司为样本,通过查阅企业的年度报告、社会责任报告与相关资料,对重污染企业生态创新及其企业特征进行调查分析,发现我国大多数企业开展生态创新仅停留在生态工艺创新和末端治理层面,生态管理创新和生态产品创新占比较低,生态创新层次有待提升;企业存续时间、企业规模与企业生态创新呈正相关关系;国有上市公司和主板上市公司更重视生态创新;研发投入强度与生态创新活动不直接相关,但生态创新企业更容易享受政府补助。 This paper used 879 listed firms in heavy pollution industries to investigate the eco-innovation and characteristics of them through consulting the annual reports,social responsibility reports and relevant materials. The results showed that most firms in China only took eco-innovation at the level of process eco-innovation and end-treatment,while organizational eco-innovation and product eco-innovation accounted for relatively low,and the whole level of eco-innovation needed to be improved. There was a positive correlation between firm life time,firm scale and eco-innovation. State-owned and main board listed firms paid more attention to eco-innovation. The intensity of R&D input was not directly related to eco-innovation,but eco-innovation firms were more likely to get government subsidies.
作者 胡元林 杜阳阳 刘静 HU Yuan-lin;DU Yang-yang;LIU Jing(School of Management and Economics,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming 650093,China)
出处 《资源开发与市场》 CAS 2020年第2期134-138,共5页 Resource Development & Market
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“资源视角下企业生态创新实现机理及路径选择”(编号:71762020)
关键词 生态创新 重污染企业 企业特征 研发投入 政府补助 eco-innovation heavy polluting firms characteristic of firms R&D input government subsidy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献67

  • 1戴小勇,成力为.财政补贴政策对企业研发投入的门槛效应[J].科研管理,2014,35(6):68-76. 被引量:106
  • 2申香华.政府补助、产权性质与债务融资效应实证检验[J].经济经纬,2015,32(2):138-143. 被引量:28
  • 3孙铮,李增泉,王景斌.所有权性质、会计信息与债务契约——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].管理世界,2006,22(10):100-107. 被引量:304
  • 4Bernauer, E, and Kammerer, S. Explaining green innovation[R]. Working Paper, Center for Comparative and International Studies, 2006: 1-16.
  • 5Charter,C. Sustainable innovation: Key conclusions from sustainable innovation[R]. Paper Presented at the Conferences 2006 Or ganized by The Centre for Sustainable Development, University College for the Creative Arts, 2007.
  • 6Gray, W B, and Shadbegian, R J. Pollution abatement costs, regulation, and plant-level productivity[R]. NBER Working Paper, W4994, 1995.
  • 7Porter, M E, and van der Linde, C. Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship[J]. Journal of Eco- nomic Perspectives, 1995b, 9(4):97-118.
  • 8Mohr, R D. Technical change, external economies, and the Porter hypothesis[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002, 43(1) : 158-168.
  • 9Jaffe, A B, Peterson, S R, Portney, P R, and Stavins, R N. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufac turing: What does the evidence tell us?[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1995, 33(1):35-68.
  • 10Jaffe, A B, Newell, R G, and Stavins, R N. Technology policy for energy and the environment[J]. Innovation Policy and the E conomy, 2004, 4(1):35-68.

共引文献214

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部