期刊文献+

专利侵权行政裁决与司法审查的冲突与协调 被引量:1

Conflict and Coordination between Administrative Determination and Judicial Review for Patent Infringement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国专利行政与司法保护的"双轨制"由于对专利侵权行政裁决性质界定不当、行政与司法机关信息交流不畅、司法终审原则的限制等原因,导致专利行政和司法资源的浪费,并抑制了"双轨制"优势的发挥。因此,应重新界定专利侵权行政裁决的性质,回归其民事争议的本质;加强专利行政和司法机关的信息化建设,实现信息的共享和沟通;完善专利侵权裁决和司法审查的协调和衔接机制,从而更好地发挥两种保护方式的优势和作用,切实维护专利权人的合法利益。 Due to inappropriate definition for administrative determination of patent infringement, absence of information between administrative agencies and judicial authorities, the restriction of judicial final principle,double-tract system of administration and judiciary for protecting patent rights has led to a waste of resources of administration and judiciary, in the meantime, impeding the function of double-tract system. Therefore, it is necessary to redefinition of administrative determination of patent infringement, to strengthen communication of information between administrative agencies and judicial authorities;to perfect the coordination mechanism between administrative procedure and judicial procedure so as to reduce the conflict between two procedures and protect legal interest of the patentees.
作者 谢黎伟 XIE Li-wei(School of Law,Fujian University of Technology,Fuzhou Fujian 350118,China)
出处 《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第6期54-59,66,共7页 Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 福建省知识产权软科学项目“专利行政执法与司法协作机制研究”(2018ER009) 福建省社会科学规划基金重点项目“互联网金融视域下知识产权融资法律机制研究”(FJ2018MGCA003)
关键词 专利侵权 行政裁决 司法 协调 patent infringement administrative determination judiciary coordination
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献89

共引文献80

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部