期刊文献+

我国部分地区医联体医保总额预付制改革的比较分析 被引量:34

Comparative Study on Global Budget Reform of Regional Health Alliance in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解我国部分典型地区医联体模式下医保总额预付制度改革的做法及实践中存在的问题。方法采用内容分析法对深圳罗湖、安徽天长、福建尤溪、浙江德清等地医保总额预付制的预付层次、复合支付方式改革、预付标的范围、预付水平设定、结算机制和监督考核等方面的做法进行梳理和深入分析。结果各地区域医联体以人群为总额预算管理单位,对单个供方实行按病种付费、DRG等复合支付方式改革,预付标的范围为医保基金支付费用总额,预付水平主要基于上年度医保基金支出增长、当年医保基金筹资水平或增长率和支出增长率等确定。结论以医联体为单位的总额预付制对供方行为的影响取决于不同管理要素产生的激励约束机制的协同作用,以区域医联体为单位的总额预付制有助于实现整合医疗卫生服务,与国际上基于价值的医保支付制度仍存在一定差距。 Objective To understand the practices and problems of global budget reform of regional health alliance in partial priority areas.Methods Content analysis was used to analyze each element of global budgeting process in Luohu of Shenzhen,Tianchang of Anhui,Youxi of Fujian,Deqing of Zhejiang,etc.Results Regional health alliance took population as payment unit,and case-based payment and DRG were applied to single provider.Prepayment scope was total amount paid by medical insurance,budget was set based on historical and capitation approach.Conclusion The impact of regional health alliance global budget on health care provider depends on synergy incentive and restraint of different elements.Global budget based on regional health alliance contributes to achieve integrated health care system.There is still big disparity compared with valued-based payment.
作者 朱晓丽 郑英 王清波 代涛 ZHU Xiao-li;ZHENG Ying;WANG Qing-bo(School of Public Administration,Renmin University of China,Beijing,100872,China)
出处 《中国医院管理》 北大核心 2020年第2期21-25,共5页 Chinese Hospital Management
基金 中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程项目(2016-I2M-3-018)
关键词 总额预付制 医联体 激励约束机制 global budget medical alliance incentive and restraint mechanisms
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献92

  • 1刘忻梅,温小霓.医保患者住院费用分布与影响因素分析[J].中国医院管理,2007,27(1):24-26. 被引量:27
  • 2人力资源社会保障部,财政部,卫生部.关于进一步推进医疗保险付费方式改革的意见[EB/OL].[2011-05-31 ]. http ://www. gov. cn/gongbao/content/2011/content_ 2004738. htm.
  • 3Figueras J, Jakubowski, Robinson R. Purchasing to Improve Health Systems Performance [ M ]. Open University Press, 2005.
  • 4Street A, Duckett S. Are waiting lists inevitable? [ J ]. Health Policy, 1996, 36(1): 1-15.
  • 5Henke K D, Murray M A, Ade C. Global budgeting in Ger- many: lessons for the United States [ J ]. Health Affairs (Millwood), 1994 ,13(4) : 7-21.
  • 6台湾全民健康保险医疗费用协定委员会.全民健康保险医疗费用总额支付制度问答辑[Z].2005.
  • 7Langenbrunner J C, Cashin C, O'Dougherty S. Designing and Implementing Health Care Provider Payment Systems: How-To Manuals [ M ]. Washington D C: World Bank, 2009.
  • 8Sutherland J M. Hospital payment mechanisms: an over- view and options for Canada [ R ]. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, 2011.
  • 9UK Department of Health. Resource Allocation: Weighted Capitation Formula ( seventh edition) [ EB/OL]. [ 2013- 07-19 ]. http ://www. dh. gov. uk/publieations.
  • 10Wiley M M. Hospital financing reform and case-mix meas- urement: an international review[ J]. Health Care Finance Review, 1992, 13(4): 119-133.

共引文献300

同被引文献444

引证文献34

二级引证文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部