破除“所有制中性论”的错误认知

Eliminate the Misunderstanding of the “Ownership Neutrality”

人类社会出现过的不同所有制各有特定的主体。它们在社会生产目的、经济活动方式以及社会生产体系中所处的地位不同,在生产过程、流通过程中所起的作用、获得社会财富的方式和份额也各不相同。所有制主体的这些差别决定了各种所有制具有不同的社会性质。将某些国际经济组织使用的“竞争中立”立场,偷换为市场关系没有性质区别的“竞争中性”,并过度引申而提出所谓“所有制中性”论,主张要促进市场公平竞争(即他们所说泊实现“竞争中性”)就不要讲企业飽所有制属性。这种说法既抹杀了生产资料所有制及其性质对社会经济关系的基础性决定作用,也是对历届党代会报告精神和习近平总书记的一系列重要指示的曲解,在理论上是错误的。

Different kinds of ownership that have appeared in human society have specific subjects.They have different positions in terms of the purposes of social production,the modes of economic activity,and the social production systems,play different roles in the production process and the circulation process,as well as have different methods and shares in acquiring social wealth.Such differences in the subjects of ownership determines different social natures of various kinds of ownership.There is a statement which changes the standpoint of ucompetitive neutrality used by some international economic organizations to“competitive neutrality” without any differences in nature of market relations,and excessively extends its meaning to propose the so-called theory of“ownership neutrality”,and then advocates the promotion of fair market competition(i.e.the realization of what they call“competitive neutrality”)without paying attention to ownership properties of enterprises.This statement not only obliterates the fundamental determinant effect of the ownership of the means of production and its nature on socio-economic relations,but also misinterprets the spirit of reports of previous congresses of party representatives and a series of important instructions by General Secretary Xi Jinping.It is theoretically wrong.