《庄子阙误》所载《庄子》八种版本考

The Eight Editions of Chuang Tzu in Chuang Tzu Error Corrections

《庄子阙误》载录唐至北宋中期《庄子》八种版本的异文,对探讨监本《庄子》的形成和影响、唐宋《庄子》的流传与演变及《庄子注疏》的形成等方面有重要的研究价值。蒋门马认为诸本异文皆是据郭注成疏、句法文意“篡改”或“增补”而造成的讹误,不足为据;将其与敦煌写本和高山寺钞本对比,发现异文中有一部分是有来源的,不是抄校者的篡改。梳理诸本之间的关系,发现天台本与监本属于同一系统,张潜夫本是以监本系统的本子为底本而成,文如海本与众本都有共同异文,可能曾参校众本,张君房所校三本则互有参考。《庄子阙误》在记录诸本异文时有不少遗漏和不完善之处,包括《庄子校诠》在内的各点校本都没有注意到;这些遗漏的异文见于《南华真经章句音义》,研究和点校时需要加以利用。

Chuang Tzu Error Corrections contains eight different versions of Chuang Tzu from Tang Dynasty to the mid-Northern Song Dynasty,which has important research value in discussing the formation and influence of Jingde Jian Edition of Chuang Tzu.Jiang Menma believes that all the variants are based on errors caused by annotations of Guo Xiang and Cheng Xuanying,syntactic and grammatical tampering or supplementing,which is not sufficient to justify.The article compares them with Dunhuang and Gao Shan Si manuscripts,and finds that some of the variants are from certain sources,not from the tampering of proofreaders.This article examines the relationship between the various editions and holds that Tiantai Mountain Version and Jian Version belong to the same system.Zhang Qianfu Version was originally based on Jian Version system.Because Wen Ruhai Version has common variants with other editions,it may have referred to them.The three editions collated by Zhang Junfang have mutual reference.There are many omissions and imperfections in the different texts of Chuang Tzu Error Corrections,which have not been noticed by different research including Chuang Tzu Corrections.These omissions can be found in The Pronunciation and Meaning of Chuang Tzu and need to be utilized in research and collation.