期刊文献+

中文版低头行为量表测评大学生群体的信度与效度 被引量:18

Revision of the Chinese Version of Generic Scale of Phubbing
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:修订低头行为量表并在中国大学生群体中检验其信效度。方法:采用一般低头行为量表、父母低头行为问卷、大学生手机成瘾倾向量表及短式抑郁-焦虑-压力量表共对1134名大学生进行施测,两周后对其中的95名大学生进行重测。结果:①探索性因素分析发现,中文版大学生低头行为量表共包含15个条目,可分为自我疏离、无手机恐惧、人际冲突和问题认知4个维度;②验证性因素分析发现,中文版大学生低头行为量表四因素模型拟合良好(χ^2/df=2.59,GFI=0.93,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.06);③中文版大学生低头行为量表与父母低头行为问卷、手机成瘾倾向量表、短式抑郁-焦虑-压力量表均呈显著正相关(r=0.33~0.74,P<0.01),其组合信度在0.63~0.92之间,平均方差抽取量在0.38~0.48之间;④信度检验发现,中文版大学生低头行为量表的Cronbach’sα系数在0.71~0.84之间;分半信度在0.65~0.77之间;重测信度在0.68~0.85(P<0.01)之间。结论:中文版大学生低头行为量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为科学的研究工具使用。 Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Generic Scale of Phubbing(C-GSP).Methods:All 1134 college students were surveyed with Parents Phubbing Scale(PPS),Mobile Phone Addiction Tendency Scale(MPATS)and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21(DAS-21).95 college students were followed to complete the Chinese version of Generic Scale of Phubbing two weeks after the first investigation.Results:①The C-GSP consisted of 15 items and four factors:problem acknowledgement,interpersonal conflict,self-isolation,and nomophobia.②The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model fits well(χ^2/df=2.59,GFI=0.93,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.06).③The C-GSP correlated with PPS,MPATS and DAS-21 positively(r=0.33~0.74,P<O.O1).In addition,the composite reliability coefficients were from 0.63 to 0.92 and AVE 0.38 to 0.48 of the C-GSP.④The C-GSP had good internal reliability with Cronbach'sαcoefficients from 0.71 to 0.84,re-test reliability coefficients from 0.68 to 0.85(P<0.01)and split-half reliability coefficients from 0.65 to 0.77.Conclusion:The Chinese version of Generic Scale of Phubbing(C-GSP)has acceptable reliability and validity and can be used to measure Phubbing behavior for Chinese college students.
作者 张璐 张丽 ZHANG Lu;ZHANG Li(School of Education,Xinyang University,Xinyang 464000,China;The Second Experimental Primary School,Linyi Economic and Technological Development Zone,Linyi 276025,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期29-32,36,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 大学生 低头行为 信度 效度 College students Phubbing Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献48

  • 1周治金,杨文娇.大学生网络成瘾类型问卷的初步编制[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(11):754-757. 被引量:62
  • 2Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression an- xiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation, 1995. 112-115.
  • 3Crawford JR, Henry JD. The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non- clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2003, 42:111-131.
  • 4Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, et al. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 1998, 10: 176- 181.
  • 5Taouk M, Lovibond PF, Laube R. Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the 21-item depression anxiety stress scales (DASS21). In Report for New South Wales Transcuhural Mental Health Centre. 2001, Cumberland Hospital: Sydney.
  • 6吴明隆.结构方程模型-AMOS的操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学.2009.309-323.
  • 7Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inentories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1995, 33:335-343.
  • 8Henry JD, Crawford JR. The 21-item version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Normative data and psychometric evaluation in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 44:227-239.
  • 9Kimberly RZ. Psychometric properties of internet admin- istered versions of Penn state worry questionnaire (PSWQ) and depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS). Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, (25): 841-843.
  • 10Taylor R, et al. The utility of somatic items in the assessment of depression in chronic pain patients: A comparison of the Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) and the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in chronic pain and clinical and community samples. Clinical Journal of Pain, 2005, 21:91-100.

共引文献951

同被引文献151

引证文献18

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部