摘要
目的:修订低头行为量表并在中国大学生群体中检验其信效度。方法:采用一般低头行为量表、父母低头行为问卷、大学生手机成瘾倾向量表及短式抑郁-焦虑-压力量表共对1134名大学生进行施测,两周后对其中的95名大学生进行重测。结果:①探索性因素分析发现,中文版大学生低头行为量表共包含15个条目,可分为自我疏离、无手机恐惧、人际冲突和问题认知4个维度;②验证性因素分析发现,中文版大学生低头行为量表四因素模型拟合良好(χ^2/df=2.59,GFI=0.93,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.06);③中文版大学生低头行为量表与父母低头行为问卷、手机成瘾倾向量表、短式抑郁-焦虑-压力量表均呈显著正相关(r=0.33~0.74,P<0.01),其组合信度在0.63~0.92之间,平均方差抽取量在0.38~0.48之间;④信度检验发现,中文版大学生低头行为量表的Cronbach’sα系数在0.71~0.84之间;分半信度在0.65~0.77之间;重测信度在0.68~0.85(P<0.01)之间。结论:中文版大学生低头行为量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为科学的研究工具使用。
Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Generic Scale of Phubbing(C-GSP).Methods:All 1134 college students were surveyed with Parents Phubbing Scale(PPS),Mobile Phone Addiction Tendency Scale(MPATS)and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21(DAS-21).95 college students were followed to complete the Chinese version of Generic Scale of Phubbing two weeks after the first investigation.Results:①The C-GSP consisted of 15 items and four factors:problem acknowledgement,interpersonal conflict,self-isolation,and nomophobia.②The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model fits well(χ^2/df=2.59,GFI=0.93,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.06).③The C-GSP correlated with PPS,MPATS and DAS-21 positively(r=0.33~0.74,P<O.O1).In addition,the composite reliability coefficients were from 0.63 to 0.92 and AVE 0.38 to 0.48 of the C-GSP.④The C-GSP had good internal reliability with Cronbach'sαcoefficients from 0.71 to 0.84,re-test reliability coefficients from 0.68 to 0.85(P<0.01)and split-half reliability coefficients from 0.65 to 0.77.Conclusion:The Chinese version of Generic Scale of Phubbing(C-GSP)has acceptable reliability and validity and can be used to measure Phubbing behavior for Chinese college students.
作者
张璐
张丽
ZHANG Lu;ZHANG Li(School of Education,Xinyang University,Xinyang 464000,China;The Second Experimental Primary School,Linyi Economic and Technological Development Zone,Linyi 276025,China)
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2020年第1期29-32,36,共5页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词
大学生
低头行为
信度
效度
College students
Phubbing
Reliability
Validity