期刊文献+

不同化疗药物治疗小细胞肺癌对患者预后及肿瘤标志物水平的影响 被引量:8

Effects of different chemotherapies on prognosis and tumor markers in patients with small cell lung cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨两种化疗方案治疗小细胞肺癌的效果差异及安全性。方法选取广西壮族自治区柳州市人民医院2013年3月至2016年3月收治的98例广泛期小细胞肺癌患者,采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组,其中49例患者采用洛铂+依托泊苷治疗(EL组),另外49例采用顺铂+依托泊苷治疗(EP组),观察两组患者近期疗效、2年生存率及不良反应,对比两组患者治疗前后的血清胃泌素释放肽前体(ProGRP)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、Ki-67、血管内皮细胞生长因子(VEGF)水平。结果EL组和EP组患者的有效率分别为48.98%(24/49)和40.82%(20/49),差异无统计学意义(χ^2=0.660,P=0.417)。EL组与EP组患者2年生存率分别为17.07%、11.11%,EL组患者的中位生存时间为17.00个月,EP组为15.00个月,差异无统计学意义(χ^2=1.094,P=0.228)。化疗前,EL组和EP组患者血清ProGRP分别为(978.4±225.7)ng/L、(940.2±237.1)ng/L,NSE分别为(43.9±10.3)ng/ml、(41.7±11.6)ng/ml,Ki-67分别为(287.5±55.3)pg/ml、(279.8±62.6)pg/ml,VEGF分别为(566.8±109.4)pg/ml、(538.1±144.0)pg/ml,组间比较差异均无统计学意义(t=0.817,P=0.416;t=0.993,P=0.323;t=0.645,P=0.520;t=1.111,P=0.269);化疗后,两组患者血清ProGRP分别为(167.3±68.5)ng/L、(180.6±62.1)ng/L,NSE分别为(17.5±4.8)ng/ml、(19.0±5.3)ng/ml,Ki-67分别为(98.0±18.6)pg/ml、(101.4±20.8)pg/ml,VEGF分别为(430.4±95.8)pg/ml、(442.8±91.0)pg/ml,组间比较差异均无统计学意义(t=-1.007,P=0.316;t=-1.468,P=0.145;t=-0.853,P=0.396;t=-0.657,P=0.513);EL组和EP组患者化疗后的血清ProGRP、NSE、Ki-67、VEGF均较化疗前显著降低,差异均有统计学意义(t=24.072,P<0.001;t=21.694,P<0.001;t=16.263,P<0.001;t=12.459,P<0.001;t=22.736,P<0.001;t=18.931,P<0.001;t=6.566,P<0.001;t=3.916,P<0.001)。化疗过程中,EL组患者≥2级腹泻和骨髓抑制的发生率[26.53%(13/49)和61.22%(30/49)]均低于EP组患者[48.98%(24/49)和81.63%(40/49)],差异均具有统计学意义(χ^2=5.254,P=0.022;χ^2=5.000,P=0.025)。结论洛铂+依托泊苷治疗小细胞肺癌较顺铂+依托泊苷疗效相当,不良反应更轻。 Objective To explore the effect and safety of two chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.Methods Ninety-eight patients with extensive small cell lung cancer admitted to Liuzhou People′s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from March 2013 to March 2016 were randomly divided into two groups by random number table method,49 of whom were treated with lobaplatin+etoposide(EL group),and another 49 cases were treated with cisplatin+etoposide(EP group).The short-term efficacy,2-year survival rate and adverse reactions of the two groups were observed.The serum levels of gastrin-releasing peptide precursor(ProGRP),neuron-specific enolase(NSE),Ki-67,vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)were compared between the two groups before and after treatment.Results The effective rates of the EL group and the EP group were 48.98%(24/49)and 40.82%(20/49)respectively,and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(χ^2=0.660,P=0.417).The 2-year survival rates of patients in the EL group and the EP group were 17.07%and 11.11%respectively.The median survival time of the EL group was 17.00 months,and that of the EP group was 15.00 months.There was no significant difference between the two groups(χ^2=1.094,P=0.228).The serum level of ProGRP was(978.4±225.7)ng/L and(940.2±237.1)ng/L,NSE was(43.9±10.3)ng/ml and(41.7±11.6)ng/ml,Ki-67 was(287.5±55.3)pg/ml and(279.8±62.6)pg/ml,and VEGF was(566.8±109.4)pg/ml and(538.1±144.0)pg/ml in the EL and EP group before chemotherapy respectively,and there were no significant differences between the two groups(t=0.817,P=0.416;t=0.993,P=0.323;t=0.645,P=0.520;t=1.111,P=0.269).The serum level of ProGRP was(167.3±68.5)ng/L and(180.6±62.1)ng/L,NSE was(17.5±4.8)ng/ml,(19.0±5.3)ng/ml,Ki-67 was(98.0±18.6)pg/ml and(101.4±20.8)pg/ml,VEGF was(430.4±95.8)pg/ml and(442.8±91.0)pg/ml in the EL and EP group after chemotherapy,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(t=-1.007,P=0.316;t=-1.468,P=0.145;t=-0.853,P=0.396;t=-0.657,P=0.513).The serum levels of ProGRP,NSE,Ki-67 and VEGF in EL group and EP group were significantly lower than those before chemotherapy(t=24.072,P<0.001;t=21.694,P<0.001;t=16.263,P<0.001;t=12.459,P<0.001;t=22.736,P<0.001;t=18.931,P<0.001;t=6.566,P<0.001;t=3.916,P<0.001).During chemotherapy,the incidences of diarrhea and myelosuppression(≥grade 2)in the EL group[26.53%(13/49)and 61.22%(30/49)]were lower than those in the EP group[48.98%(24/49)and 81.63%(40/49)],and the differences were statistically significant(χ^2=5.254,P=0.022;χ^2=5.000,P=0.025).Conclusion Lobaplatin+etoposide is less toxic than cisplatin+etoposide in the treatment of small cell lung cancer,and adverse reactions of its is relatively slighter.
作者 张东伟 蓝冰 Zhang Dongwei;Lan Bing(Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,Liuzhou People′s Hospital,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Liuzhou 545006,China)
出处 《国际肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2019年第10期585-589,共5页 Journal of International Oncology
基金 广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题(Z20190032) 广西壮族自治区柳州市人民医院院内科研基金(lryjc201908)。
关键词 小细胞肺癌 治疗结果 洛铂 依托泊苷 顺铂 Small cell lung carcinoma Treatment outcome Lobaplatin Etoposide Cisplatin
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献79

  • 1曹子昂.2014第一版NCCN小细胞肺癌治疗指南解读[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2013,5(12):79-81. 被引量:26
  • 2于春虎,张魁灵.晚期非小细胞肺癌的化疗新进展[J].实用全科医学,2005,3(1):74-75. 被引量:31
  • 3李书新,杨明华,马宝庆.以肺外表现为首发症状的肺癌32例误诊分析[J].临床误诊误治,2006,19(4):28-29. 被引量:10
  • 4杨柳青,施毅,秦叔逵,钱军,韩宝惠,潘良熹,马胜林,李恩孝,蔡光蓉,李园,于国华,杨俊兰,王华庆,储大同.洛铂联合长春瑞滨治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2006,11(12):890-894. 被引量:39
  • 5孙燕 周际昌.临床肿瘤内科手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.586-591.
  • 6?berg K,Hellman P,Ferolla P,et al.Neuroendocrine bronchial and thymic tumors:ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis,treatment and follow-up[J].Ann Oncol,2012,23(7):120.
  • 7Salgia R,Hensing T,Campbell N,et al.Personalized treatment of lung cancer[J].Semin Oncol,2011,38(2):274.
  • 8Haddadin S, Perry MC. History of small-cell lung cancer [ J]. Clin Lung Cancer,2011,12(2) :87-93.
  • 9Califano R,Abidin AZ,Peck R,et al. Management of small cell lung cancer : recent developments for optimal care [ J ]. Drugs, 2012,72 (4) :471-490.
  • 10Xie CY, Xu YP, Jin W, et al. Antitumor activity of lobaplatin alone or in combination with antitubulin agents in non-small-cell lung cancer [ J ]. Anticancer Drugs,2012,23 (7) :698-705.

共引文献70

同被引文献84

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部