期刊文献+

足月新生儿胎盘形态学指标与出生体重关联出生队列研究 被引量:2

Relationship between placental morphological parameters and birth weight in term newborns: a birth cohort study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨足月新生儿中胎盘各形态学指标对出生体重的影响作用。方法于2013年5月-2014年9月,对来自马鞍山优生优育队列(MABC)中妊娠8~14周期间纳入的3474名孕妇,于孕早、中、晚期收集其社会人口学信息和妊娠并发症等,在胎儿分娩后测量并记录新生儿体格发育数据和胎盘形态学指标数据,计算2604名足月、单胎儿的胎盘表面积及体积,采用方差分析或χ^2检验描述各指标的基本分布特征,logistic回归模型分析胎盘形态学指标和出生体重的可能关联以及性别差异。结果在2064名研究对象中,各胎盘形态学指标的均数分别为胎盘长径18.95 cm、宽径16.61 cm、厚径2.35 cm、表面积248.67 cm^2以及体积390.72 cm^3,均随新生儿出生体重的增加而增大。控制混杂因素进行logistic回归分析表明,胎盘长径较小(OR=2.15,95%CI=1.46~3.15)、宽径较小(OR=1.71,95%CI=1.17~2.50)、表面积较小(OR=2.94,95%CI=2.08~4.16)、体积较小(OR=3.84,95%CI=2.01~4.01)均是小于胎龄儿(SGA)危险因素;而胎盘长径较大(OR=0.48,95%CI=0.25~0.95)和表面积较大(OR=0.54,95%CI=0.29~0.99)是SGA的保护因素;胎盘长径较大(OR=2.23,95%CI=1.66~2.99)、宽径较大(OR=1.54,95%CI=1.14~2.09)、厚径较大(OR=2.60,95%CI=1.92~3.54)、表面积较大(OR=3.54,95%CI=2.69~4.65)和体积较大(OR=4.34,95%CI=3.28~5.75)均是大于胎龄儿(LGA)的危险因素;而胎盘宽径较小(OR=0.38,95%CI=0.24~0.61)、表面积较小(OR=0.43,95%CI=0.27~0.70)和体积较小(OR=0.48,95%CI=0.29~0.78)是LGA的保护因素。按新生儿性别分层后得出,胎盘宽径较小对SGA发生风险的影响仅存在于男婴中,胎盘宽径较大对LGA发生风险的影响仅存在于女婴中,胎盘体积较小对LGA发生风险的影响仅存在于男婴中。结论胎盘形态学大小与胎儿宫内生长密切相关,同时受胎儿性别的影响。 Objective To explore the effect of various morphological indexes of placenta on birth weight in full-term neonates.Methods From the Ma′anshan-Anhui Birth Cohort(MABC)–a study on eugenics in Anhui province,we consecutively recruited 3474 women at 8–14 gestation weeks between May 2013 and September 2014.Information on sociodemographics and pregnancy complication at first,second,and third trimester were collected among the pregnant women;physique of the newborns and morphological parameters of placentae were measured at the deliveries of the women.Placental surface area and volume were calculated for 2604 pregnant women with full-term singleton.Analysis of variance and chi-square test were used to describe distribution characteristics of the data collected.Logistic regression model was used to analyze the relationship between placental morphological indicators and birth weight.Results The means of placenta morphological indicators were 18.95 cm for length,16.61 cm for width,2.35 cm for thickness,248.67 cm^2 for surface area,and 390.72 cm^3 for volume and all the indicators increased with the increment of newborn birth weight.After adjusting for confounding factors,the results of logistic regression indicated that smaller placenta length(odds ratio[OR]=2.15,95%confidence interval[95%CI]:1.46–3.15),width(OR=1.71,95%CI:1.17–2.50),surface area(OR=2.94,95%CI:2.08–4.16),and volume(OR=3.84,95%CI:2.01–4.01)were risk factors of small for gestational age(SGA);while greater placenta length(OR=0.48,95%CI:0.25–0.95)and surface area(OR=0.54,95%CI:0.29–0.99)were protective factors for SGA.In contrary,greater placenta length(OR=2.23,95%CI:1.66–2.99),width(OR=1.54,95%CI:1.14–2.09),thickness(OR=2.60,95%CI:1.92–3.54),surface area(OR=3.54,95%CI:2.69–4.65),and volume(OR=4.34,95%CI:3.28–5.75)were risk factors of large for gestational age(LGA);but smaller placenta width(OR=0.38,95%CI:0.24–0.61),surface area(OR=0.43,95%CI:0.27–0.70),and volume(OR=0.48,95%CI:0.29–0.78)were protective factors of LGA.The effect of smaller placenta width on the risk of SGA,greater placenta width on the risk of LGA,and smaller placenta volume on the risk of LGA were only observed among the pregnant women giving birth to male,female,and male infants.Conclusion The size of the placenta is closely related to intrauterine growth and is influenced by the sex of the fetus.
作者 刘婷婷 黄锟 伍晓艳 童娟 潘婉 邹长姗 陶芳标 LIU Ting-ting;HUANG Kun;WU Xiao-yan(Department of Maternal,Child and Adolescent Health,School of Public Health,Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Population Health and Aristogenics,Anhui Medical University,Hefei,Anhui Province 230032,China)
出处 《中国公共卫生》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期60-65,共6页 Chinese Journal of Public Health
基金 国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1000204–2) 国家自然科学基金(81872630)
关键词 胎盘 出生体重 队列研究 placenta birth weight cohort study
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献77

  • 1于冬梅,赵丽云,刘爱东,于文涛,贾凤梅,张继国,翟凤英.中国活产新生儿低出生体重发生率及影响因素[J].中华预防医学杂志,2007(S01):150-154. 被引量:53
  • 2杨业洲,陈廉.孕妇体重及其临床意义[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(5):268-270. 被引量:52
  • 3中国15城市新生儿体格发育科研协作组.我国15城市不同胎龄新生儿体格发育调查研究[J].中华儿科杂志,1988,26(4):206-208.
  • 4Fortes Filho JB, Valiatti FB, Eckert GU, et al. Is being small for gestational age a risk factor for retinopathy of prematurity? A study with 345 very low birth weight preterm infants[ J]. J Pediatr( Rio J), 2009,85 (1):48-54.
  • 5Hong R, Ruiz-Beltran M. Low birth weight as a risk factor for infant mortality in Egypt [ J ]. East Mediterr Health J, 2008,14 (5) :992-1002.
  • 6Wang KC, Botting KJ, Padhee M, et al. Early origins of heart disease: low birth weight and the role of the insulin-like growth factor system in cardiac hypertrophy [ J ]. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2012,39 ( 11 ) :958-964.
  • 7Fenton TR. A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format [ J ]. BMC Pediatr, 2003,3:13.
  • 8WHO. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age [ DB ]. Geneva : WHO, 2006 : 1-336.
  • 9Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Smooth centile curves for skew and kurtotic data modelled using the Box-Cox power exponential distribution. Stat Med, 2004,23 (19) :3053-3076.
  • 10van Buuren S, Fredriks M. Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves. Stat Med, 2001,20 (8) : 1259-1277.

共引文献359

同被引文献14

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部