期刊文献+

创新视角下药品特殊审评与再评价衔接研究——基于欧盟经验 被引量:1

Research on the link between expedited review and drug reevaluation from the perspective of innovation incentive based on the European Union’s experience
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国的药品特殊审评体系经过多年的发展取得了显著进展,但在审评质量和效率上同发达国家仍存在较大的差距。本文深入分析我国特殊审评体系存在的问题,基于对欧盟特殊审评体系和上市后再评价的经验借鉴,提出完善多通道的特殊审评体系并建立特殊审评与上市后再评价的衔接具体建议,以期提升审评效率,激发创新热情。 Expedited review system in China has made a significant progress after years of development.However,a large gap in the quality and efficiency of the review between developed countries and China still exists.This paper did an in-depth analysis on the existing problems of expedited review in China.Based on the experience from expedited review and drug post-marketing clinical study in the European Union,specific suggestions were put forward to improve a multi-channel system of expedited review and the link between the two was established.We expect for the improvement of review efficiency and the inspiration of innovation enthusiasm through the suggestions.
作者 颜建周 张丽杨 雷璐倩 邵蓉 YAN Jian-zhou;ZHANG Li-yang;LEI Lu-qian;SHAO Rong(National Drug Policy and Medical Industry Economy Research Center of China Pharmaceutical University,Nanjing 211198,China)
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第24期2921-2925,共5页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目——我国创新药物政策环境研究(15ZDB167)
关键词 特殊审评 条件审批 上市后安全性研究 创新激励 expedited review conditional approval post-authorization safety study(PASS) innovation incentive
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献49

  • 1芮国忠,程增江.我国未来新药研发模式与格局之变化——兼论新《药品注册管理办法》之影响[J].中国医药技术经济与管理,2007(3):6-9. 被引量:6
  • 2宋华琳.中美两国药品加速审评程序之比较分析[J].中国医药技术经济与管理,2007,1(5):6-11. 被引量:3
  • 3FDA.Guidance for Industry:Fast Track Drug Development Programs-Designation,Development,and Application Review[EB/OL].[2009-8-10]http://www.fda.goy / downloads / Drugs / GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation / Guidances / UCM079736.pdf.
  • 4Harmark L van Grootheest AC. Phannacovigilance: meth- ods, recent developments and future perspectives[J]. Eur J Clin Pharnuwol, 2008, 64(8): 743-52.
  • 5中华人民共l硐1H卫生部,围家食品药品监督管理局.药品不良反应报告和监测管理办法[ER/OL].[2011-07-01].http://www.sflta.govmn/WS01/CL0053/62621.html.
  • 6Nelson RC, Peck CC. Clinical pharmacology training at the Fond & Drug Administration[J]. J Clin Pharmacol, 1992, 32(5): 400-6.
  • 7Hartford CG, Petchel KS, Mickail H, et al. Pharma- eovigilanee during the pre-approval phases: an evolving pharnlaceutieal industry model in response to ICH E2E, CIOMS VI, FDA and EMEA/CHMP risk-management guidelines[J]. Drug Saf 2006, 29(8): 657-73.
  • 8Shirlow E, Faunce T. Recent legal developments and the authority of the Australian Therapeutic Goods Ad- ministration[J]. J Law Med, 2009, 16(5): 764-9.
  • 9Gough S. Post-marketing surveillance: a UK/European perspeetive[J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2005, 21(4): 565-70.
  • 10Kelly WN, Arellano FM, Barnes J, et al. Guidelines for stJbmi/ting adverse event reports tot publieation[JJ. Drug Saf 2007, 30(5): 367-73.

共引文献78

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部