期刊文献+

中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在脓毒症中的研究进展 被引量:9

Progress in the study of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in sepsis
原文传递
导出
摘要 脓毒症是成人重症监护病房住院和死亡的主要原因之一。临床观察发现当患者病情进展为脓毒症时,耗费大量医疗资源的同时病死率也明显升高。因此,对脓毒症患者进行早期诊断、病情评估、预测预后显得至关重要。目前临床上有较多生物标志物或评分标准,因其各自不同的缺陷,使临床应用受到限制。近年来,国内外许多研究者发现了中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值作为一种简便有效的指标与脓毒症患者的病情进展存在着相关性。本综述总结了中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在脓毒症中的研究进展,旨在指导临床医师对脓毒症患者病情有更好的认识,帮助临床医师及时完善诊疗方案,从而降低脓毒症患者的病死率,改善其预后。 Sepsis is one of the leading causes of hospitalization and death in adult intensive care units.Clinical observations have found that when the patient's condition progresses to sepsis,the cost of medical resources is also increased and the mortality rate is also significantly increased.Therefore,early diagnosis,disease assessment,and prognosis of sepsis patients are crucial.At present,there are many biomarkers or scoring standards in clinical practice because of their different defects,which limits the clinical application.In recent years,many researchers at home and abroad have found that neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a simple and effective index is related to the progression of patients with sepsis.This review summarizes the research progress of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in sepsis,aiming to guide clinicians to have a better understanding of the condition of patients with sepsis,to help clinicians improve the diagnosis and treatment plan in time,thereby reducing the mortality rate of patients with sepsis,to improve its prognosis.
作者 潘萌萌 宋维 廖明喻 韩铭欣 武免免 焦光宇 Pan Mengmeng;Song Wei;Liao Mingyu;Han Mingxin;Wu Mianmian;Jiao Guangyu(Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang 110004,China)
出处 《国际呼吸杂志》 2020年第1期70-73,共4页 International Journal of Respiration
基金 国家自然科学基金(81170068) 辽宁省重点研发攻关项目(2017225009) 辽宁省科学技术基金(2015020521)。
关键词 脓毒症 死亡率 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值 Sepsis Mortality Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献66

  • 1左大明,陈政良.巨噬细胞甘露糖受体的结构与功能[J].免疫学杂志,2004,20(z1):15-17. 被引量:4
  • 2张莹,姚咏明,盛志勇.调节性T细胞研究进展[J].生理科学进展,2007,38(1):83-88. 被引量:17
  • 3Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW , et al. The Third Interna?tional Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock(Sepsis-3)[J].JAMA,2016,315(8) :801-810.
  • 4Coopersmith CM, Wunsch H, Fink MP, et al. A comparison of crit?ical care research funding and the financial burden of critical illness in the United States[J]. Crit Care Med,2012,40( 4): 1072-1079.
  • 5Aziz M,Jacob A, Yang WL,et al. Current trends in inflammatory and immunomodulatory mediators in sepsis[J]. Leukoc Bioi, 20 13,93 (3) : 329-342.
  • 6Wherry EJ,Kurachi M. Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion[J]. Nat Rev Immunol,2015, 15(8) :486-499.
  • 7Citro A, Bamaba V, Martini H. From T cell apoptosis to chronic immune activation in inflammatory diseases[J]. Int Arch Allergy Im?munol, 2014, 164(2): 140-146.
  • 8Binkowska AM, Michalak G, Slotwinski R. Current views on the mechanisms of immune responses to trauma and infection[J]. Cent EurJ Immunol,2015 ,40(2) :206-216.
  • 9Hutchins NA, UnsingerJ ,Hotchkiss RS,et a1. The new normal-im?munomodulatory agents against sepsis immune suppression[J]. Trends Mol Med ,2014,20(4):224-233.
  • 10Monneret G,Venet F,Pachot A,et al. Monitoring immune dys?functions in the septic patient, a new skin for the old ceremony[J]. Mol Med,2008, 14(1 -2): 64-78.

共引文献170

同被引文献66

引证文献9

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部