我国对北美护理诊断分类系统相关研究的文献计量学分析

Application of “NANDA Nursing Diagnoses: Definition and Classification” in China: an analysis with literature metrology

目的分析目前我国对北美护理诊断分类系统(North American Nursing Diagnosis Association,NANDA)相关研究现状,探讨其发展趋势,为后期进一步研究提供理论参考及数据支持。方法收集万方、知网、维普数据库及PubMed-Medline、Cochrane-CENTRAL、Embase数据库自建库至2018年12月公开发表的有关护理诊断的研究文献,获取文献后从文献发文时间趋势、主题研究、研究类型、证据级别、研究关注点进行分析。结果检索获取1477篇文献,最终纳入264篇文献。基于NANDA的护理诊断相关研究发文时间集中在1999年—2002年;主题研究主要集中在护理方法学研究;研究类型以非干预性研究为主;研究证据级别以低级别的观察性和描述性文献为主;研究关注点以NANDA临床应用、推广和使用感受为主。结论我国护理研究者在护理诊断领域还没有形成一个核心的研究团队。需要对NANDA分类系统进行跨文化的信度和效度调试,以及研究在中国文化环境中对患者护理结果的影响,从而为我国护理诊断理论体系提供更全面的研究基础。

and full text screening identified 264 eligible citations.These citations on nursing diagnosis based on NANDA was concentrate mainly on published from 1999 to 2002.The MeSH of nursing diagnosis focuses on nursing methodology.The research types mainly are non-intervention research.The level of research evidence is mainly observational and descriptive at the lower level.The research focuses on the clinical application,promotion and experience of the nursing diagnoses classifications of NANDA.Conclusions The nursing researchers in the field of nursing diagnosis have not yet formed any core research team.It is imperative that we should carry out of reliability and validity of the NANDA classification from the cross-cultural prospective and investigate its impact on care outcomes so as to build a comprehensive research basis for domesticated nursing diagnosis theory in China.