摘要
自铃木敬、张珠玉、郭声波等发现南宋史料没有关于“画院”的记载之后,近年来彭慧萍又以“复置记录”、“科层结构”、“省舍院址”等为关键证据,提出“‘南宋画院’为无省舍机构的‘虚拟画院’”的论断,完全推翻了南宋画院的真实存在。本文对彭慧萍所提出的三项关键证据逐一提出质疑,认为南宋存在实体画院。并通过对此前学界未发现的新文献材料进行细读,结合考古发掘成果,纠正南宋画院院址在“富景园”、“武林园”之误,提出其院址大致位于杭州皇城北门“和宁门”西侧的万松岭附近。
After Suzuki Kei,Zhang Zhuyu and Guo Shengbo found that there was no record of the“Art Academy”among the historical materials of the Southern Song Dynasty,in recent years,Peng Huiping has taken the“resetting records”,“hierarchical structure”and“location of the Central Office”as key evidence and put forward the conclusion that the“Southern Song Art Academy”is a“virtual academy”without the Central Office,which completely overturned the existence of the Southern Song Art Academy.In this paper,the three key evidence put forward by Peng Huiping are questioned one by one,thinking that in the Southern Song Dynasty the Art Academy was an entity.Through the detailed reading of the new literature materials that were not found in the academic circle before,and combined with the achievements of archaeological excavation,this paper corrects the mistakes that the site of Southern Song Art Academy is in“Fu Jing Yuan”and“Wu Lin Yuan”;and proposes that the academy is roughly located near Wansongling,which is on the west side of“Hening Gate”,the north gate of the Imperial City in Hangzhou.
出处
《美术》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期117-121,共5页
Art Magazine
关键词
南宋画院
实体画院
院址考辨
Southern Song Art Academy
entity of Art Academy
locational research