期刊文献+

三种土壤水势传感器在原状与扰动黏壤土上测定精度评价

Measuring Accuracy Evaluation of Three Kinds of Water Potential Sensors for Undisturbed and Disturbed Clay Loam
原文传递
导出
摘要 分别在田间原状黏壤土和室内扰动黏壤土上安装MPS-1、MPS-6、pF水势传感器与TDR315L土壤水分传感器测定土壤水分特征曲线,通过比较测定结果的准确性,提出了三种土壤水势传感器的使用建议。结果表明:MPS-1传感器虽测量范围窄,但无论在原状黏壤土还是扰动黏壤土上均表现良好;MPS-6和pF传感器测量范围宽,但测量的水势值精度不高,且MPS-6传感器对温度敏感,pF传感器在使用期间内表现不稳定。MPS-1传感器应用于原状和扰动黏壤土由其数据拟合出的土壤水分特征曲线与对照曲线重合度较高,而MPS-6和pF传感器应用于原状和扰动黏壤土,当含水量高于0.30 cm^3cm^-3时测定结果拟合得到的水分特征曲线与对照曲线重合度较高。比较三个水势传感器的测量表现,可以认为MPS-1传感器用于含水量高于0.30 cm3cm-3的原状黏壤土和含水量高于0.17 cm^3cm^-3的扰动黏壤土,MPS-6传感器用于含水量高于0.30 cm^3cm^-3的原状和扰动黏壤土测定土壤水势的效果较好。本研究结果可为使用上述三种传感器测定土壤水分特征曲线提供参考。 The accuracy of three soil water potential sensors were investigated for undisturbed and disturbed clay loam soil,in order to provide reference for soil water potential measurement and in-situ soil water characteristic curve measurement.MPS-1,MPS-6 and pF water potential sensors and TDR315 L soil moisture sensor were installed in the undisturbed and disturbed clay loam soil respectively.The soil water characteristic curves were fitted by the laboratory data and the sensor data,and then the accuracies of the three water potential sensors were compared.The results showed that MPS-1 sensor had a narrow measurement range,but performed accurately in its range of measurement when it was used in the disturbed and undisturbed clay loam soils.The MPS-6 and pF sensors had a wide measurement range but a low accuracy.The MPS-6 sensors were temperature sensitive and pF sensors were unstable during the measurement.The soil water characteristic curve fitted by MPS-1 sensors in the undisturbed and disturbed clay loam soils had a higher coincidence with the control curve.The curves fitted by MPS-6 and pF sensors for disturbed and undisturbed soils had good coincidences with the control curve at water content higher than 0.30 cm3 cm-3.Comparing the three water potential sensors,MPS-1 sensors are suitable to measure soil water potential in undisturbed clay loam soil with water content higher than 0.30 cm^3 cm^-3 and in disturbed clay loam soil with water content higher than 0.17 cm^3 cm^-3,MPS-6 sensors are suitable to measure soil water potential in undisturbed clay loam soil and in disturbed clay loam soil with water content higher than 0.30 cm^3 cm^-3.
作者 刘俏润 朱志梅 樊军 LIU Qiao-run;ZHU Zhi-mei;FAN Jun(College of Urban and Environment Science,Northwest University,Xi'an 710127,China;Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,NorthwestA&F University,Yangling 712100,China;State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Fanning on the Loess Plateau,Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources,Yangling 712100,China)
出处 《土壤通报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第6期1315-1322,共8页 Chinese Journal of Soil Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(41571224)“水蚀风蚀交错区灌草植被对降雨入渗过程的影响与模拟”资助
关键词 土壤水势 水势传感器 土壤水分特征曲线 Soil water potential Water potential sensor Soil water characteristic curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1van Genuchten M Th.A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.Soil Sci.Soc.Am.J,1980,44:892~ 898
  • 2Brooks R H,Corey A J.Hydraulic properties of porous media.Hydrol.Paper 3.Fort Collins,CO:Colo.State Univ,1964.3,27
  • 3Wang Q J,Horton R,Shao M A.Horizontal infiltration method for determining Brooks-Corey model parameters.Soil Sci.Soc.Am.J,2002,66(6):1 733 ~ 1 739
  • 4庄季屏 王伟.土壤低吸力段持水性能及其与早期土壤干旱的关系研究.土壤学报,1986,23(4):306-313.
  • 5Imhoff S, Ghiberto P J, Grioni A, et al. Porosity characterization of Argiudolls under different management systems in the Argentine Flat Pampa[J]. Geoderma, 2010,158 (3/4) : 268-274.
  • 6Bengough A G, Mullins C E, Wilson G. Estimating soil frictional resistance to metal probes and its relevance to the penetration of soil by roots[J]. Eur. J. Soil Sci. ,1997,48(4) :603-612.
  • 7Gale M R,Grigal D F. Vertical root distributions of northern tree species in relation to successional status[J]. Can. J. Forest Res. ,1987,17(8) :829-834.
  • 8Gardner W R, Hillel D, Benyamini Y. Post-irrigation movement of soil water: 1. Redistribution[J]. Water Resour. Res. , 1970,6(3) : 851-861.
  • 9孙迪,夏静芳,关德新,王安志,吴家兵,袁凤辉.长白山阔叶红松林不同深度土壤水分特征曲线[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(6):1405-1409. 被引量:22
  • 10朱首军.渭北旱塬梯田土壤水分特征曲线的测定及分析[J].西北林学院学报,1999,14(4):23-26. 被引量:5

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部