摘要
权威辞书对"璈""云璈"的释义存在模糊、矛盾之处,这些问题也影响到了具体的注释活动。现有研究成果以及新的书证表明"璈""云璈"存在两个义项,一个是作为弦乐器,一个是作为打击乐器。当下具体注释活动中出现的问题,要求我们必须充分重视词义的历时分界。针对"璈""云璈"的个案研究,对辞书编纂工作也具有一定的参考价值。
The definitions of "ao(璈)" and "yun ao(云璈)" in authoritative dictionaries are ambiguous and contradictory, which also affects the specific annotation activities. Existing research results and new documentary evidence show that there are two meanings of "ao(璈)" and "yun ao(云璈)". One is as a stringed instrument, the other is as a percussion instrument. At present, the problems in the specific annotation activities require us to pay full attention to the diachronic division of word meaning. In addition, the case study of "ao(璈)" and "yun ao(云璈)" is of certain significance and value to the compilation of dictionaries.
作者
桑萌春
刘祖国
Sang Mengchun;Liu Zuguo(College of Literature,Shandong University,Jinan,Shandong,250100)
出处
《语文学刊》
2020年第1期51-55,共5页
Journal of Language and Literature Studies
基金
山东大学文学院重大项目“新编《道教大词典》及道教文献语料数据库建设”、山东大学人文社科青年团队项目“宗教社会历史文献整理与研究”之“道教类书整理与研究”(IFYT18007)的阶段性成果
山东大学青年学者未来计划(2018WLJH18)资助
关键词
璈
云璈
历时分界
辞书编纂
ao(璈)
yun ao(云璈)
diachronic division of word meaning
dictionary compilation