设计思维：一种面向21世纪教育创新的实践框架被引量：18

Design Thinking:A Practical Framework Facing Educational Innovation of 21st Century

下载PDF

导出

摘要面向21世纪的教育需要创新,设计思维为教育中问题识别、分析和解决提供了一种实践框架,并逐渐在教育领域受到重视。本文在梳理设计思维内涵及特征的基础上,对设计思维框架进行了详细的阐述。同时,结合文献梳理、案例分析与实践观察,分别从学习空间、课堂教学及学校教育三类场景阐述了设计思维应用路径,并结合设计思维应用案例进行剖析,以期为推进我国教育创新提供借鉴。 The education facing 21st century needs innovation,and design thinking has provided a practical framework for the recognition,analysis and solution to the problems in education,and gradually gained attention in the field of education.On the basis of combing through the connotation and characteristics of design thinking,this paper has explained the framework of design thinking in detail.Meanwhile,this paper,combining literature combing,case study and practical observation,has expounded the application routes of design thinking from three scenes respectively,namely,learning space,classroom teaching and school education,and analyzed by combining application case of design thinking,hoping to provide reference for the promotion of educational innovation in China.

作者朱龙 ZHU Long(School of Teacher Education,Guangdong University of Education,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China 510303)

机构地区广东第二师范学院教师教育学院

出处《数字教育》 2020年第1期32-35,共4页 Digital Education

基金广东省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划2019年度青年项目“新师范”背景下教师设计思维提升策略研究（GD19YJY01）

关键词设计思维 21世纪教育教育创新框架 design thought 21st century education educational innovation framework

分类号 G4 [文化科学—教育技术学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1尼尔.安德森,卡洛琳.蒂姆斯,卡林.哈吉哈希米,肖俊洪.使用设计思维方法提高在线学习质量[J].中国远程教育,2014(17):5-12. 被引量：34
2金慧,胡盈滢,宋蕾.技术促进教育创新——新媒体联盟《地平线报告》(2017高等教育版)解读[J].远程教育杂志,2017,35(2):3-8. 被引量：76

二级参考文献21

1Ambrosini, V. & Bowman, C. (2001). Tacit knowledge: Some sugges- tions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies 38(6), 811-825.
2Anderson, Neil (2013). Design thinking as a means of enhancing the creative and innovative abilities of undergraduate students when ere- ating web based learning activities. In: Proceedings of Society for In- formation Technology and Teacher Education 24th Annual Confer- ence (pp. 4181-4186). From: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education 24th International Conference, 25-29 March 2013, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
3Bell, S. (2008). Design thinking. American Libraries, 39(1/2), 44-49.
4Bradley, D., Noonan, P., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian Higher Education. Retrieved from: http://www.innovation.gov.au/ HigherEducation/Documents/Review/PDF/Higher% 20Education% 20Review_Title%20page%20to%20chapter%202.pdf.
5Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Horn- stein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: De- sign thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37-53.
6Castillo, J. (2002). A note on the concept of tacit knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(1), 46-57.
7Day, R. (2005). Clearing up implicit knowledge: Implications for knowledge management, information science, psychology and social epistemology. Journal of the American Society for Information Sci- ence and Technology, 56(6), 630-635.
8Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Acade- my of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512-523.
9He, Y., Swenson, S. & Lents, N. (2012). Online Video Tutorials In- crease Learning of Difficult Concepts in an Undergraduate Analytical Chemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1128-1132.
10Johansson-Skoldberg U., Woodilla, J. & Cetinkaya, M. (2013). De- sign thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Inno- vation Management, 22(2), 121-146.