摘要
百年来价值转形问题研究存在对马克思理论逻辑的三大偏误:一是误将全部社会产品划分为三个相互割裂的固定部分;二是误将生产价格与价格混为一谈;三是错把理论手段当作理论目的。本文按照这一理解对转形问题研究的各种流派进行归类、比较及分析,特别对我国政治经济学界在转形问题研究中的各种理论观点进行梳理和评论,并提出以"一个总量相等,一个比率不变"为特征的解决方案,即转形理论C体系。
This article argues that there are three biases against Marx’s logic in research of transformation problem in past hundred years. First,whole social products was wrongly divided into three broken parts. Second,production price was wrongly treated as price. Third,theory’s procedure was wrongly treated as theory’s target. Based on this understanding,this article classifies,compares,and analyzes the various schools of research on transformation issues,and specifically sorts out and comments on various theoretical viewpoints in the research of transformation issues in Chinese political economic academia. It also proposes a solution characterized by "one equal aggregate and one unchanged rate",namely the C system of transformation theory.
作者
荣兆梓
Rong Zhao-zi(Institute for Advanced Study of Economic and Social Development,Anhui University,Hefei Anhui 230009)
出处
《经济纵横》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期9-28,F0002,共21页
Economic Review Journal
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“马克思主义经济学广义转形理论及模型研究”(编号:15AJL002)的成果
关键词
价值转形
利润平均化
生产价格
总剩余价值率不变
转形理论C体系
Value Transformation
Profit Equalization
Production Price
Unchanged Total Rate of Surplus Value
C system of Transformation Problem