期刊文献+

C-HRA-3耐热合金850℃持久性能及组织特征 被引量:3

Stress rupture properties and microstructure characteristic of C-HRA-3 heat-resistant alloy at 850 ℃
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究了C-HRA-3耐热合金在850℃持久试验过程的碳化物特征。结果表明:当持久应力为120 MPa时,持久寿命为37. 8 h,主要析出相包括M23C6相和Ti(C,N)相,高应力状态下,M23C6相沿变形带析出。当持久应力为80 MPa时,持久寿命延长至491 h,晶界处M23C6相部分回溶,导致晶界特征不明显,同时细小M23C6相重新析出,晶内析出的Ti(C,N)相尺寸增加。不同应力下试样的断裂方式均为沿晶断裂,裂纹源优先在尺寸较大的析出相(M23C6和Ti(C,N))周围萌生,导致伸长率随持久寿命延长而减小。 The carbide characteristics of C-HRA-3 heat-resistant alloy during the creep rupture test at 850 ℃ were studied. The results show that when the stress is 120 MPa,the rupture time is 37. 8 h. The main precipitated phases are M23C6 and Ti( C,N) phase. Under high stress condition,M23C6 phase precipitates along the deformation zone. When the stress is 80 MPa,the rupture time is prolonged to 491 h,the Ti( C,N) in inter-granular grows and coarsens,and the M23C6 phase at the grain boundary partially dissolves,resulting in the indistinct grain boundary characteristics and the re-precipitation of the fine M23C6 phase. The fracture modes of specimens under different stress condition are inter-granular fracture,and the crack source preferentially sprouts around the larger precipitates(M23C6 and Ti( C,N)),resulting in the decrease of the elongation of the rupture section with the extension of the rupture time.
作者 陈正宗 刘正东 董陈 包汉生 张鹏 韩魁 高佩 Chen Zhengzong;Liu Zhengdong;Dong Chen;Bao Hansheng;Zhang Peng;Han Kui;Gao Pei(Institute for Special Steels,Central Iron and Steel Research Institute,Beijing 100081,China;Fushun Special Steel Shares Co.,Ltd.,Fushun Liaoning 113006,China;Jiangsu Yinhuan Precision Steel Tube Co.,Ltd.,Wuxi Jiangsu 214200,China)
出处 《金属热处理》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期135-139,共5页 Heat Treatment of Metals
基金 国家重点研发计划(2017YFB0305203) 科技基金课题(17T61120A)
关键词 C-HRA-3耐热合金 持久试验 碳化物 C-HRA-3 heat-resistant alloy creep rupture test carbide
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

  • 1李佃国,尹法杰,李长荣.GH674高温合金的热变形行为[J].金属热处理,2005,30(8):5-7. 被引量:14
  • 2余式昌,吴申庆,宫友军,宫元生,练明生.6Cr21Mn10MoVNbN气阀钢晶粒长大及其动力学研究[J].钢铁,2006,41(6):71-76. 被引量:6
  • 3Y. V. R. K. Prasad.Processing maps: A status report[J].Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.2003(6)
  • 4US DOE Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee, Generation IV Inter- national Forum. A technology roadmap for Generation IV nuclear energy sys- tems. USA: US DOE Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee, Generation IV International Forum; 2002. Report No.: GIF-002-O0.
  • 5Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L No. 109-58, 119 Stat. 595 (Aug 8, 2005).
  • 6Bredimas A. Status of the NGNP Industrial Alliance work and the business plan economics. In: IAEA Technical Meeting on the Economic Analysis of High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors and Small and Medium Sized Reactors; 2015 Aug 25-28; Vienna, Austria; 2015.
  • 7Nuclear Energy Advisory Council Letter to Dr. Steven Chu. 2011 Jun 30. Avail- able from: http:/]energy.gov]sites]prod]files]NEAC%20Review%20Signed.pdf.
  • 8NGNP Industry Alliance Letter to Dr. Steven Chu. Implementation strategy for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant Project. 2009 Nov 30. Available from: http : //www.ngnpalliance.org[index.php[resources]downloadIczoOMzoiL2sx- aTRkOHY4bDIvejBjM2OyczYvQ2h l XzExMzAyMDASXO5HTIAxLnBkZil7.
  • 9Idaho National Laboratory [lnternet]. Idaho Falls: Association of Energy Online Resources. [cited 2015 Sep 10l. Available from: https://inlportal.inl.gov/portal/ server, pt?open=S12&objlD452&mode2&in_hi_userid=2&cached=true.
  • 10Petti D, Maki J, Hunn J, Pappano P, Barnes C, Saurwein J, et al. The DOE advanced gas reactor fuel development and qualification program. JOM 2010;62(9):62-6.

共引文献42

同被引文献44

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部