摘要
随着中国美术步人全球化的艺术语境,艺术家表现手法多元化和使用媒介材料的广泛化,使临摹、拼贴、复制图像,挪用现成品或他人的艺术作品成为一种常见的艺术现象。然而,从蔡国强《威尼斯收租院》的版权纠纷到克里斯蒂安•西尔万指责叶永青抄袭,越来越多的案例引发艺术界关于创作合法性的探讨。当前,“艺术法”作为一门新兴的交叉学科,以艺术、法律的双重视角去解释艺术现象并提供解决方案,为推动艺术生态良性发展提供了新思路和新方法。本文以艺术创作中最易引起争议的“挪用”问题为研究对象,从艺术法角度阐述其在文化艺术和法律中所承载的不同内涵。
As the globalization of Chinese art,the diversification of artists means of expression and the comprehensive use of media materials have made imitating,coilaging,copying images and borrowing ready-made or other people's works of art a common phenomenon in the art circle.However,from the copyright dispute over Cai Guoqiang s Venices Rent Collection Courtyard to Christian Silvain's accusation of Ye Yongqings plagiarism,a growing number of cases have prompted discussions in the circle of art about the legality of creation.At present,Art Law as an emerging interdisciplinary subject,interpreting art phenomena and providing solutions from the dual perspectives of both art and law,has provided new ways of thinking and new methods for promoting the positive development of art ecology.This paper takes the most controversial issue of"Appropriation"in artistic creation as the research object and expounds its different connotations from the perspective of Art Law in the fields of culture,art and law.
出处
《美术》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期12-17,共6页
Art Magazine