人类学批评的合理性分析——以许烺光和马林诺夫斯基为例

On the Rationality of Anthropology Criticism——Taking Francis L. K. Hsu and Malinowski as An Example

科学与非科学的二元分立,无论在学术领域还是日常生活领域都是相当普遍的,这种分立具有相当广泛的社会基础。对科学与非科学在研究对象的观念和行为中是否存在界限这一问题,马林诺夫斯基和许烺光发表不同的观点。许烺光对马林诺夫斯基的批评是否合理及这一批评过程所能呈现的诸多问题,是值得学界探讨的。

The dichotomy between science and non-science is quite common in both academic field and daily life,with an extensive social foundation.L.K.Hsu and Malinowski hold different views on the issue that whether there is a clear boundary in the conception and behavior of the research object regarding science and non-science.It is worth for the academic field exploring the rationality of L.K.Hsu’s criticism as well as many problems that are presented in this process.