期刊文献+

发展质量的国际比较与中国借鉴 被引量:1

International Comparison of Development Quality and Reference for Chinese
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在辨析发展质量概念基础上,以环境和收入分配的库茨涅茨曲线为理论基础,探讨中国的发展质量并进行国际比较。结果发现,中国发展质量经历了改善—恶化—再改善3个阶段;中国、印度和美国发展质量与经济增长呈现U型曲线,日本则呈现倒U型曲线。进一步分析发现,美国和日本经济增长与收入差距并不存在关联,经济增长对发展质量的影响不会因为收入差距发生变化,经济增长是影响发展质量的关键因素。作为人口最多的发展中国家,中国和印度的发展质量及影响因素表现出一致性,处在上升阶段的经济增长对发展质量的影响在更高的收入差距水平下的作用增强。中美日印4国发展质量的国际比较表明,中国实现高质量发展的目标需要将收入差距控制在一定范围的同时推动经济快速增长。 On the basis of discriminating the concept of development quality,the paper studies the factors affecting the quality of development and international comparison based on the Kuznets curve of environment and income distribution.It is found that China s development quality has experienced three stages of improvement-deterioration-improvement;China,India and the United States have U-shaped curves between development quality and economic growth,while Japan presents an inverted U-shaped curve.Further analysis finds that there is no correlation between the income gap between the United States and Japan and economic growth.The impact of economic growth on the quality of development would not change because of the income gap.Economic growth is a key factor affecting the quality of development.As the populous developing countries,China and India show consistency in the quality of development and influencing factors,and the impact of economic growth in the rising stage on the quality of development increased under the higher income gap level.Through the international comparison of the quality of development among China,Japan,America and India,it is shown that China s goal of high-quality development requires the income gap to be kept in a certain range while promoting rapid economic growth.
作者 肖周燕 Xiao Zhouyan(School of labor Economics,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China)
出处 《中国科技论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期165-175,共11页 Forum on Science and Technology in China
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目“城市群视角下人口——经济与环境空间耦合机制与调控路径研究”(19ARK001)
关键词 发展质量 经济增长 收入差距 国际比较 Development quality Economic growth Income gap International comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献116

共引文献2844

同被引文献26

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部