期刊文献+

论私法的法理与法理的私法 被引量:3

On the Legal Principle of Private Law and the Private Law of Jurisprudence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在发生学意义上,法理与私法之间具有最紧密的内在逻辑与外在勾连关系,首先罗马私法的发展与完善深受古希腊罗马自然法之法理的深刻影响,正是古希腊的正义思想孕育了罗马人的个人权利思想,从而为罗马私法提供了基本的个人权利范式与私法的基本原则;其次斯多葛学派自然法思想孕育了罗马人普遍适用的更高级的理性法与人人平等的观念,为罗马私法的普遍性与法律上人人平等原则奠定了基石。近代私法典的编纂则是十七八世纪古典自然法法理的写照与体现。进入20世纪之后,私法发展受到现代法学流派如自由法学、目的法学、利益法学、社会法学等法理思想的深刻影响,进而形成现代民法或私法。而私法自身也同样蕴含着深刻的法理,其中,法律人格构成法学的核心概念。 In the genetic sense,there is the closest internal logic and external connection between jurisprudence and private law.First,the development and improvement of Roman private law was deeply influenced by the jurisprudence of ancient Greek and Roman natural law.It was the ancient Greek thought of justice that gave birth to the Romans'personal rights,and thus provided the basic personal rights paradigm and the basic principles of private law for Roman private law.The Stoic thought of natural law gave birth to the higher rational law of universal application and the concept of equality of all,which laid the foundation for the universality of Roman private law and the principle of equality of all in law.The compilation of modern private law code is the portrayal and embodiment of the classical natural law of the 17th and 18th centuries.Since the 20th century,the development of private law has been deeply influenced by the jurisprudence of modern schools of law,such as liberal jurisprudence,objective jurisprudence,interest jurisprudence,social jurisprudence,and so on,thus forming modern civil law or private law.Private law itself also contains profound jurisprudence,among which legal personality constitutes the core concept of jurisprudence.
作者 范进学 FAN Jin-xue(School of Law,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200030,China)
出处 《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期19-29,共11页 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目“加强宪法实施、教育和监督研究”(18JZ036) 国家社会科学基金重点项目“宪法解释制度比较研究”(17AFX011)
关键词 法理学 私法 法理 法律人格 jurisprudence private law legal principle legal personality
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献84

  • 1徐显明.人权主体之争引出的几个理论问题[J].中国法学,1992(5):35-39. 被引量:25
  • 2霍尔斯特.埃曼,杨阳.德国法中一般人格权的概念和内涵[J].南京大学法律评论,2000(1):211-220. 被引量:28
  • 3Brian Tierney, supra note, pp.62 - 65.
  • 4《格拉提安教令集》.
  • 5Dist. 1, dictum ante c. 1. and Dist. 1 c. 7. , Cfr. Brian Tierney, supra note, pp. 58 -59.
  • 6See James H. Hutson,supra note,p. 196.
  • 7Brian Tierney, supra note, pp.40 - 41.107 - 109,125.
  • 8See Robert Feenstra, Legal Scholarship and Doctrines of Private Law, 13 th-18 th Centuries, VARIORUM, 1996, III( Dominium and ius in re aliena: The Origins of a Civil Law Distinction), pp. 112 - 113,116.
  • 9See Brian Tiemey, supra note,pp. 107 - 108 and Occam, OND ( Opus Nonaginta Dierum,《90日作品集》.[英]奥卡姆.《给托钵修士少数派的信及其他著作》(英文影印本).中国政法大学出版社,2003年版,页24.
  • 10See Brian Tiemey, supra note, p. 123,130.

共引文献113

同被引文献33

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部