期刊文献+

多层螺旋CT诊断急性肺栓塞的临床有效性分析 被引量:6

Clinical Effectiveness Analysis of Multislice Spiral CT in the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨多层螺旋CT诊断急性肺栓塞的临床有效性分析。方法:选取我院2017年2月-2019年4月收治的肺栓塞患者70例为研究对象,比较两组患者肺栓塞的确诊率。结果:观察组患者肺栓塞确诊率为97.1%,显著高于对照组85.7%(P<0.05)。结论:多层螺旋CT诊断肺栓塞操作简便、安全、高效,确诊率高,可为临床诊治提供准确的参考依据,提高患者的救治率,值得推荐。 Objective: To explore the clinical effectiveness of multislice spiral CT in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Methods: 70 patients with pulmonary embolism admitted to our hospital from February 2017 to April 2019 were selected as research objects, and the diagnosis rates of pulmonary embolism in the two groups were compared. Results: The diagnosis rate of pulmonary embolism in the observation group was 97.1%, significantly higher than the control group’s 85.7%(P<0.05). Conclusion: MSCT is simple, safe and efficient in diagnosing pulmonary embolism with high diagnosis rate, which can provide accurate reference for clinical diagnosis and improve the treatment rate of patients, it’s recommended.
作者 王刚 毕聪 WANG Gang;BI Cong(Department of Radiology,the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University,Liaoning 10032,China)
出处 《影像技术》 CAS 2020年第2期46-48,共3页 Image Technology
关键词 多层螺旋CT 肺栓塞 确诊率 Multislice Spiral CT Pulmonary Embolism the Diagnosis Rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献112

  • 1胡大一,张鹤萍,孙艺红,姜立清.华法林与阿司匹林预防非瓣膜性心房颤动患者血栓栓塞的随机对照研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(4):295-298. 被引量:162
  • 2邹治鹏,何建国,程显声,赵彦芬,陈白屏,高莹,熊长明,倪新海,荆志诚.230例急性肺动脉血栓栓塞症患者对症治疗、抗凝治疗和溶栓治疗的住院转归[J].中国循环杂志,2006,21(3):219-221. 被引量:27
  • 3廖庆红,陆雅琴,王敏敏.慢性阻塞性肺疾病测定血清肌钙蛋白Ⅰ和心肌酶谱的临床意义[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2008,17(3):432-432. 被引量:9
  • 4CharlsonME, PompeiP, AlesKL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation[J]. J Chronic Dis, 1987, 40(5): 373–383.
  • 5HallWH, RamachandranR, NarayanS, et al. An electronic application for rapidly calculating Charlson comorbidity score[J]. BMC Cancer, 2004, 4: 94. DOI: 10.1186/1471–2407–4–94.
  • 6NgAC, ChowV, YongAS, et al. Prognostic impact of the Charlson comorbidity index on mortality following acute pulmonary embolism[J]. Respiration, 2013, 85(5): 408–416. DOI: 10.1159/000342024.
  • 7GoldhaberSZ, VisaniL, De RosaM. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER)[J]. Lancet, 1999, 353(9162): 1386–1389. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140–6736(98)07534–5.
  • 8LaporteS, MismettiP, DecoususH, et al. Clinical predictors for fatal pulmonary embolism in 15 520 patients with venous thromboembolism: findings from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa (RIETE) Registry[J]. Circulation, 2008, 117(13): 1711–1716. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.726232.
  • 9RadovanovicD, SeifertB, UrbanP, et al. Validity of Charlson Comorbidity Index in patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome. Insights from the nationwide AMIS Plus registry 2002-2012[J]. Heart, 2014, 100(4): 288–294. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl–2013–304588.
  • 10SuidanRS, LeitaoMM, ZivanovicO, et al. Predictive value of the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index on perioperative complications and survival in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 138(2): 246–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.034.

共引文献712

同被引文献41

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部