对“同案同判”的全面理解及其实现

Comprehensive understanding and realization of "the same case with the same judgment"

"同案同判"作为一项重要的民间和司法诉求,具有符合民众思维逻辑和心理期待的现实意义、体现和保障法律的平等价值和安定价值的法律意义、塑造司法形象和提升司法公信力的司法意义。但是"同案同判"也并非没有合理边界,尤其是在考虑到对实质公平和个案正义的必要诉求、对法官司法理性和自由裁量权的必要尊重等方面。为了对"同案同判"进行全面的理解,有必要在承认其价值合理性的同时,界定其存在的合理边界。为了更好地实现"同案同判"的积极意义,还需要对与其实践相关的制度--案例指导制度进行反思与完善。

As an important folk and judicial pursuit ",the same case with the same judgment" has the realistic significance of conforming to the people′s thinking logic and psychological expectation,the legal significance of embodying and guaranteeing the equal value and stability value of laws,and the judicial significance of shaping the judicial image and enhancing its credibility.However, "the same case with the different judgment" is not without reasonable boundaries,especially in view of the necessary pursuit of substantive fairness and case justice,and the necessary respect for the judicial rationality and discretion of judges.In order to have a comprehensive understanding of "the same case with the same judgment",it is necessary to recognize the rationality of its value and define its reasonable boundary.In order to better realize the positive significance of " the same case with the same judgment",we need to rethink and improve its practical system-the case guidance system.