期刊文献+

民本与君主:孔子思想的二重性

The People-Oriented or the Monarch-Oriented: the Duality of Confucius’ Thoughts
原文传递
导出
摘要 周代民本政治用人性统治取代鬼神统治,强调统治者应以德裕民、明智驭民,才能据有天命、受享国祚。但"君为民主"的权力等级又使得以民为本的政治设想不能落到实处,从而使天命失落,政治衰败。孔子应春秋时期人民主体性确立的时代要求,将周代贵族民本政治发展为以人为本的平民民本思想,建立了仁学或儒学。但作为孔子民本思想出发点的人(平民)也并不平等,而是君王凌驾君子、君子凌驾小人的新的等级制度。民本与君主的冲突,形成了孔子思想的二重性。只有剔除君主维度,改造和发扬民本维度,才是儒学现代性转化的关键。 The people-oriented politics of Zhou Dynasty replaces the rule of ghosts and gods with the rule abiding to human nature, emphasizing a governance of people with virtue and wisdom, so as to enjoy a doomed destiny given by the Heaven and an eternal governance. However, the power of "monarch being the owner of the people" fails the policy and leads to the loss of destiny and political decline. Confucius later transforms the people-oriented politics of Zhou Dynasty into the people-oriented thoughts, and established "Ren Xue" or Confucianism. However, people(civilians), as the starting point of Confucius’ people-oriented thoughts, are not yet equal, but a new hierarchy in which the king is superior to the gentleman and the gentleman is superior to the villain. The conflict between being people-oriented and monarch-oriented forms the duality of Confucius’ thoughts. The key to the transformation of the modernity of Confucianism is to eliminate the monarch and rework on the peopleoriented dimension.
作者 张可越 Zhang Keyue
机构地区 厦门大学中文系
出处 《上海文化》 CSSCI 2020年第2期79-86,126,127,共10页 Shanghai Culture
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“马克思·舍勒的政治哲学研究”(项目号:19YJC720027)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1谢岳.总统制与议会制:民主巩固的体制视角[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,13(3):9-14. 被引量:4
  • 2萧功秦.2003.《当代中国的地方苏丹化倾向论析》,http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/Xiaopaper.pdf.
  • 3Diamond, Larry, Martin, Seymour, Lipset and Linz, Juan J. Building and Sustaining Democratic Government in Developing Countries: Some Tenative Findings. World Affairs. 150 (1):5--20.
  • 4Linz, Juan J., 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • 5Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred,1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Uni- versity Press.
  • 6Linz, Juan J. and Chehabi, H., 1998. Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • 7Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred, 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • 8Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo, 1994. The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • 9Linz, Juan J., 1998. "Democracy's Time Constraints." International Political Science Review. 19(1): 19--38.
  • 10邹谠.《二十世纪中国政治》,香港:牛津大学出版社1994年版,第234页.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部