摘要
文章主要在提出“分解的思路”和“全体论与整体实存的思路”此一参照系,以作为学界理解、诠释与分判传统中国哲学的参考。全文除了说明笔者近二十年来中国哲学研究的一个“核心问题意识”、一组“分判标准”以及两个“主要论点”外,并且枚举了“理”与“气”、“心斋”以及“色即是空”与“空即是色”三个例子,来说明此两“思路”的不同,并于文末作出三点简要总结。
This paper mainly proposes the reference system of"subdivided thinking"and"totalistic&holistic existential thinking"as a reference for the understanding,interpretation and subdivision of traditional Chinese philosophy.In addition to explaining the author's research on Chinese philosophy in the past 20 years,he has a"core problem consciousness",a set of"sub-criteria"and two"main arguments".and enumerates three examples of"Li&Qi","Xinzhai"and"Form itself is emptiness&Emptiness itself is form"to illustrate the difference between the two"Thinking".At the end of this paper,the author made a brief summary of three points.
作者
陈立骧
CHEN Lixiang(General Education Center,Gaoyuan University of Science and Technology,Kaohsiung,Taiwan 82152.China)
出处
《吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
2020年第2期48-54,共7页
Journal Of Jilin Normal University:Humanities & Social Science Edition
关键词
心斋
理与气
分解的思路
色即是空与空即是色
全体论与整体实存的思路
Xinzhai
Li&Qi
subdivided thinking:Form itself is emptiness&Emptiness itself is form
totalistic&holistic existential thinking