期刊文献+

基层医院无管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石的临床效果研究 被引量:6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨基层医院无管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石的临床效果。方法85例上尿路结石患者,随机分为无管化组(44例)及肾造瘘管组(41例)。无管化组行无管化经皮肾镜取石术,肾造瘘管组行传统经皮肾镜取石术。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后血红蛋白(Hb)下降值、结石清除率(术后<4 mm的残石认为无临床意义)、术后并发症发生情况、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后镇痛药使用量、术后住院时间。结果两组患者均成功施行了手术。两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后Hb下降值、结石清除率、术后并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。无管化组的术后VAS评分[2.0(1.0,3.0)]分低于肾造瘘管组的[3.0(1.2,5.0)]分,术后镇痛药使用例数和量2例(4.5%),100.0 mg少于肾造瘘管组的8例(19.5%),138.0 mg,术后住院时间[5.0(5.0,6.0)]d短于肾造瘘管组的[6.0(5.0,7.0)]d,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论基层医院无管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石可获得与传统经皮肾镜取石术同等满意的疗效,且无管化经皮肾镜取石术具有术后疼痛轻、术后镇痛药使用量少、住院时间短的优点。
出处 《中国实用医药》 2020年第5期58-60,共3页 China Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献90

  • 1Lu HF, Shekarrlz B, Stoller ML. Donor-gifted allograft urolithiasis : early percutaneous management. Urology ,2002,59 : 25-27.
  • 2Al-Otalbi K, Hosking DH, Percutaneous stone removal in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol, 1999,162:674-677.
  • 3Streem SB, Yost A, Dolmatch B. Combination“sandwlch” therapy for extensive renal calculi in 100 consecutive patients:immediate,long-term and stratified results from a 10-year experience. J Urol, 1997,158:342-345.
  • 4Feng MI,Tamaddon K, Mikhail A,et al. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology ,2001,58:345-350.
  • 5Lojanapiwat B, Soonthornphan S, Wudhikarn S. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol, 2001,15 : 711 -713.
  • 6DUTY B,OKHUNOV Z, SMITH A, et al. The debate over percutaneous nephrolithotomy positioning: a comprehensive re- view[J]. J Urol, 2011, 186(1) :20-25.
  • 7DESIO M, AUTORINO R, QUARTO G, et al. Modified su pine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a pro spective randomized trial[J]. Eur Urol, 2008,54 (1) : 196-202.
  • 8FALAHATKAR S, MOGHADDAM AA, SALEHI M, et al. Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique[J]. J Endourol, 2008, 22 (11) : 2513-2517.
  • 9SHOMA AM, ERAKY I, EL-KENAWY MR, et al. Pereutane- ous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: technical aspects and functional outcome compared with the prone technique[J]. Urol ogy, 2002, 60(3):388-392.
  • 10FRIEDLANDER JI, DUTY BD, SMITH AD,et al. Percutane- ous nephrostolithotomy: an assessment of costs for prone and Galdakao-modified supine Va~divia positioning [ J ]. Urology, 2012,80(4) :771-775.

共引文献103

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部