期刊文献+

某院近5年住院患者肠杆菌科细菌分布及耐药监测分析 被引量:11

Analysis on bacterial distribution and drug resistance monitoring of Enterobacteriaceae among inpatients in a hospital during recent five years
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对该院2013-2017年住院患者分离的肠杆菌科细菌分布及药敏情况进行统计分析,为临床治疗及合理选择抗菌药物提供依据。方法采用纸片扩散法(K-B法)或自动化仪器(VITEK2-compact系统)对临床分离的5562株非重复肠杆菌科细菌进行药敏试验,并按美国临床实验室标准化协会(CLSI)相关标准判断药敏结果。结果共收集该院临床分离的非重复肠杆菌科细菌5562株,其中大肠埃希菌2820株,肺炎克雷伯菌1607株,阴沟肠杆菌317株及其他肠杆菌科细菌818株。5年间肠杆菌科细菌的检出率基本持平,2013年为50.9%,2017年为51.1%。药敏试验数据显示,所有肠杆菌科细菌对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、亚胺培南、厄他培南、头孢替坦和阿米卡星保持了高的敏感率(>90.0%),对头孢哌酮/舒巴坦、头孢他啶和头孢吡肟也有较高的敏感率(73.0%~89.3%),对氨曲南、庆大霉素、妥布霉素、左氧氟沙星、环丙沙星、氨苄西林/舒巴坦、头孢唑林、头孢曲松、复方磺胺甲噁唑的敏感率较低(27.3%~66.1%),对氨苄西林的敏感率最低(8.0%)。5年间,产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)大肠埃希菌检出率从62.7%上升到64.6%;产ESBLs肺炎克雷伯菌检出率从37.5%下降至30.5%。碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)检出率为1.6%。结论肠杆菌科细菌对常见抗菌药物的耐药率总体呈下降趋势,但CRE菌株的日趋增多,给临床治疗造成严重影响,应充分利用细菌耐药监测结果进行感染控制,提高临床抗菌药物合理使用的意识,有效遏制该类菌株感染的发生。 Objective To statistically analyze the bacterial distribution and drug sensitivity situation of Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from the inpatients in a hospital during 2013-2017 to provide an evidence for clinical treatment and rational selection of antibacterial agents.Methods The Kirby-Bauer method or automatic analyzer(VITEK2-compact)were adopted to conduct the drug susceptibility test on 5562 clinically isolated non-repeated strains of Enterobacteriaceae.The results were judged according to the CLSI 2017 related criteria.Results A total of 5562 clinically isolated non-repeated strains of Enterobacteriaceae were collected,in which 2820 strains were E.coli,1607 strains were Klebsiella spp.,317 strains were E.cloacae and 818 strains were other strains of Enterobacteriaceae.The detection rate of Enterobacteriaceae was basically equal during these 5 years,the rate was 50.9% in 2013,and the rate was 51.1% in 2017.The drug sensitivity test data showed that all Enterobacteriaceae maintained the high sensitivity(>90.0%)to piperacillin/tazobactam,imipenem,ertapenem,cefotetan and amikacin,high sensitivity(73.0%-89.3%)to cefoperazone-sulbactam,ceftazidime and cefepime,low sensitivity(27.3%-66.1%)to aztreonam,gentamicin,tobramycin,ciprofloxacin,levofloxacin,cefoperazone-sulbactam,cefazolin,ceftriaxone and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole,and the lowest sensitivity(8.0%)to ampicillin.During the 5-year period,the detection rate of ESBLs-producing E.coli strains was increased from 62.7% in 2013 to 64.4%in 2017,but the detection rate of ESBLs-producing Klebsiella spp.strains was decreased from 37.5% to 30.5%.The detection rate of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae(CRE)was 1.6%.Conclusion The resistance rate of Enterobacteriaceae to commonly used antibacterial shows the overall decreasing trend,but the CRE strains are increased day by day,and cause the serious influence to clinic.The bacterial drug-resistant monitoring results should be fully applied to conduct the infection control,increase the rational use awareness of antibacterial drugs for effectively restraining the occurrence of these bacterial infection.
作者 田金静 康亚丽 路秀芳 张丽媛 任更朴 TIAN Jinjing;KANG Yali;LU Xiufang;ZHANG Liyuan;REN Gengpu(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Liaocheng Municipal Second People's Hospital,Liaocheng,Shandong 252600,China)
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2020年第6期739-743,747,共6页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
基金 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2018WS441)。
关键词 肠杆菌科细菌 细菌耐药性分析 碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科细菌 Enterobacteriaceae bacterial resistance analysis carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1王辉,俞云松,王明贵,倪语星,马越,任健康,韩锟,卓超,徐英春,胡云建,胡志东,曹彬,罗燕萍,褚云卓,廖康,康梅,张冀霞.替加环素体外药敏试验操作规程专家共识[J].中华检验医学杂志,2013,36(7):584-587. 被引量:134
  • 2胡付品,郭燕,朱德妹,汪复,蒋晓飞,徐英春,张小江,张朝霞,季萍,谢轶,康梅,王传清,王爱敏,徐元宏,沈继录,孙自镛,陈中举,倪语星,孙景勇,褚云卓,田素飞,胡志东,李金,俞云松,林洁,单斌,杜艳,郭素芳,魏莲花,邹凤梅,张泓,王春,胡云建,艾效曼,卓超,苏丹虹,汪瑞忠,房华,俞碧霞,赵勇,龚萍,郭大文,赵金英,刘文恩,李艳明,金炎,邵春红,温开镇,张贻荣,徐雪松,鄢超,喻华,黄湘宁,王山梅,楚亚菲,张利侠,马娟,周树平,周艳,朱镭,孟晋华.2016年中国CHINET细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2017,17(5):481-491. 被引量:778
  • 3沈继录,潘亚萍,徐元宏,倪语星,孙景勇,王传清,王爱敏,徐英春,张小江,汪复,朱德妹,胡付品,蒋晓飞,单斌,杜艳,张泓,孔菁,卓超,苏丹虹,杨青,魏莲花,吴玲,张朝霞,季萍,胡志东,李金,胡云建,艾效曼,谢轶,康梅,俞云松,林洁,孙自镛,陈中举,黄文祥,贾蓓,褚云卓,田素飞,韩艳秋,郭素芳.2005—2014年CHINET大肠埃希菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2016,16(2):129-140. 被引量:120
  • 4徐安,卓超,苏丹虹,胡付品,朱德妹,汪复,蒋晓飞,徐英春,张小江,孙自镛,陈中举,倪语星,孙景勇,胡志东,李金,张朝霞,季萍,王传清,王爱敏,杨青,徐元宏,沈继录,单斌,杜艳,张泓,孔菁,魏莲花,吴玲,谢轶,康梅,胡云建,艾效曼,俞云松,林洁,黄文祥,贾蓓,禇云卓,田素飞,韩艳秋,郭素芳.2005-2014年CHINET克雷伯菌属细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2016,16(3):267-274. 被引量:122
  • 5田磊,陈中举,孙自镛,徐英春,张小江,倪语星,孙景勇,汪复,朱德妹,徐元宏,沈继录,张泓,孔菁,杨青,魏莲花,吴玲,胡志东,李金,王传清,王爱敏,卓超,苏丹虹,谢轶,康梅,单斌,杜艳,张朝霞,季萍,胡云建,艾效曼,褚云卓,田素飞,贾蓓,黄文祥,俞云松,林洁,韩艳秋,郭素芳.2005—2014年CHINET肠杆菌属细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2016,16(3):275-283. 被引量:72
  • 6王启,季萍,徐修礼,徐英春,孙自镛,胡志东,俞云松,杨滨,廖康,路娟,褚云卓,梅亚宁,韩立中,冯献菊,王辉.2016年中国14家教学医院革兰阴性杆菌耐药监测分析[J].中华检验医学杂志,2017,40(8):614-622. 被引量:32

二级参考文献57

  • 1刘晓强,钟日辉,严海燕.404株大肠埃希菌耐药性变迁分析[J].实用医技杂志,2008,15(32):4531-4533. 被引量:5
  • 2卓超,苏丹虹,倪语星,孙景勇,俞云松,杨青,孙自镛,简翠,汪复,朱德妹,胡付品,蒋晓飞,王传清,王爱敏,徐元宏,沈继录,徐英春,孙宏莉,张泓,李万华,单斌,杜艳,张朝霞,季萍,贾蓓,黄文祥,魏莲花,吴玲,胡云建,艾效曼.2009年中国CHINET大肠埃希菌和克雷伯菌属细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2010,10(6):430-435. 被引量:81
  • 3Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-first informational supplement. MI00-S22. Wayne, PA:CLSI,2012.
  • 4European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version I. I, 2010-04-27.
  • 5Jones RN, Ferraro MJ, Reller LB, et al. Multicenter studies of tigecycline disk diffusion susceptibility results for Acinetobacter spp.J Clin Microbiol,2007 ,45 :227-230.
  • 6Fernrindez-Mazarrasa C, Mazarrasa 0, CalvoJ, et al. High concerntration of mananese in Mueller-Hinton agar increase MICs of tigecyc:line determined by Etest.J Clin Microbiol, 2009, 47: 827-829.
  • 7Bradford PA, Petersen PJ, Young M, et al. Tigecycline MIC testing by broth dilution requires use of fresh medium or addition of the biocatalytic oxygen-reducing reagent oxyrase to standardize the test method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother ,2005,49 :3903-3909.
  • 8Curcio D, Fernandez F. Comment on: Effect of different Mueller?Hinton agars on tigecycline disc diffusion susceptibility for Acinetobacter spp.J Antimicrob Chemother ,2008,62: 1166-1167.
  • 9Casal M, Rodriguez F,Johnson B, et al. Influence of testing methodology on the tigecycline activity profile against presumably tigecycline-nan-susceptible Acinetobacter spp.J Antimicrob Chemather, 2009, 64:69-72.
  • 10Zarkotou 0, Pournaras S, Altouvas G, et al. Comparative evaluation of tigecycline susceptibility testing methods far expanded-spectrum cephalosporin and carbapenem-resistant gram?negative pathogens.J Clin Microbiol, 2012, 50 :3747-3750.

共引文献1164

同被引文献118

引证文献11

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部