职务犯罪案件认罪认罚从宽制度研究

The Application of the System of Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment with Leniency in Cases of Job-related Crimes

《监察法》规定了职务犯罪案件调查阶段认罪认罚从宽制度,但在价值取向、适用条件和具体适用程序等方面与刑事诉讼认罪认罚从宽制度有较大的差异。从总体上看,职务犯罪案件调查阶段认罪认罚制度呈现出更为浓厚的职权色彩。为充分发挥认罪认罚从宽制度的功能,实现《监察法》与《刑事诉讼法》的有效对接,在实体标准层面,应遵循认罪认罚从宽条件一体化思路;在证据层面,需要在坚守法定证明标准的前提下,完善口供补强规则,落实疑罪从无原则,并在吸收认罪认罚从宽原则精神的基础上,设立污点证人作证制度等;在程序层面,调查阶段应当构建保障被追诉人知悉权规则、值班律师制度以及多层次限制人身自由的强制性措施体系,同时还应规范相关文书的适用。

The Supervision Law provides for the application of the system of pleading guilty and accepting punishment with leniency(PGAPL)to job-related crimes at the investigation stage.However,there are some differences between the Criminal Procedure Law and the Supervision Law in the application of the PGAPL in such aspects as value orientation,applicable conditions and concrete procedures.In general,the application of this system to job-related crimes at the investigation stage shows a strong inquisitorial color.In order to give full play to the PGAPL and achieve effective linkage between the Supervision Law and the Criminal Procedure Law,China should adopt the following measures:to adhere to the integration of conditions of application of the PGAPL at the substantive standard level;to stick to legal standard of proof,improve corroboration rule of confession,implement“in dubio pre peo”principle and establish the“tainted witness”system at the evidence level;and to construct the system for safeguarding the right of the accused to know,the duty lawyer system,and the multi-level compulsory measure system at the stage of investigation and to standardize the application of related documents at the procedural level.