期刊文献+

腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术中膀胱切除前后标准淋巴结清扫效果比较 被引量:9

Standard lymph node dissection before and after laparoscopic cystectomy:a comparative study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察在腹腔镜膀胱癌根治术中膀胱切除前后进行标准盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)两种手术方案的相关临床指标变化。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年5月长海医院接受腹腔镜膀胱癌根治术加标准淋巴结清扫的63例肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者的临床资料,其中男性54例,女性9例;年龄41~85岁,平均(66±9)岁。由2位不同的主刀医生分别实施先清扫淋巴结组(A组)和后清扫淋巴结组(B组)。统计术中及术后的相关临床指标,结果用t检验、非参数检验和卡方分析进行统计分析。结果两组的年龄、体质指数和肿瘤分期等术前基线指标无统计学差异。A、B组清扫淋巴结总数分别为11.3±5.8和13.6±5.1(P>0.05),阳性淋巴结检出率分别为15.6%(5/32)和22.6%(7/31,P>0.05),并发症发生率分别为9.4%(3/32)和3.2%(1/31,P>0.05);术中出血量和手术前后血红蛋白、白蛋白以及肌酐变化值等无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术在膀胱切除前后行标准PLND在淋巴结清扫数量、术后临床指标变化方面两组无显著性差异,两种手术方式在熟练掌握手术技巧后均安全、有效。 Objective To explore the clinical and pathological outcomes of standard pelvic lymph node dissection(PLND)before and after radical cystectomy(RC).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 63 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer(MIBC) who received RC and PLND in our hospital from Jan.2018 to May 2019.The patients included 54 males and 9 females,and age ranged from 41 to 85 years,average(66±9) years.PLND before RC(group A) and after RC(group B) were performed by two surgeons respectively.Relevant intraoperative and postoperative parameters were collected and analyzed with t test,non-parametric test and chi-square analysis.Results There were no significant differences in age,body mass index,tumor stage,intraoperative blood loss,hemoglobin,albumin and creatinine between the two groups(P>0.05).The total number of dissected lymph nodes in group A and group B were 11.3±5.8 and 13.6±5.1,respectively(P=0.096),respectively;rates of positive lymph node were 15.6%(5/32) and 22.6%(7/31)(P=0.482);incidences of complications were 9.4 %(3/32) and 3.2%(1/31)(P=0.628),respectively.Conclusion Standard PLND before and after RC had no significant difference in terms of the number of lymph node dissected and changes of postoperative clinical parameters.Both surgical approaches are safe and effective with skilled surgeons.
作者 尤志交 曾蜀雄 宋家璈 高红亮 许传亮 张振声 YOU Zhi-jiao;ZENG Shu-xiong;SONG Jiao-ao;GAO Hong-liang;XU Chuan-liang;ZHANG Zhen-sheng(Department of Urology,Changhai Hospital,The Second Military Medical University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2020年第3期234-237,共4页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 膀胱肿瘤 腹腔镜 全膀胱切除术 淋巴结清扫术 bladder tumor laparoscope radical cystectomy pelvic lymph node dissection
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1BABJUK M, OOSTERLINCK W, SYLVESTER R, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder,the 2011 update[J]. Eur Urol,2011,59(6):997 1008.
  • 2LUCCA I, ROUPRET M, KLUTH I., et al. Adjuvant cisplatin based combined chemotherapy for lymph node (LN)positive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder(UCB) after radical cystecto- my(RC) :a retrospective international study ofgt:1500 patients [J]. BJU Int,2015,115(5) :722 727.
  • 3BURKHARD FC, ROTH B, ZEHNDER P, et al. Lymphadenec tomy for bladder cancer: indications and controeersies[J]. Urol Clin North Am,2011,38(4):397 405.
  • 4HERMANS TJ,FOSSION LM. Oncologie outcome after laparo- scopic radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant or adjuvant thera- py with a median follow up of 32 months[J]. Urol Int,2014,92(1):55-63.
  • 5STUD1 D, SVATEK RS, NIEI.SEN ME, et al. Extent of pelvic lymph node dissectionduring radical cystectomy:is bigger better? [J]. Rev Urol,2014,16(4) : 159-166.
  • 6BI L, HUANG H, FAN X, et al. Extended vs non-extended pelvic lymph node dissection and their influence on recurrence-free sur vival in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder canc er:a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies [J]. BJU Int,2014,113(5b):E39-48.
  • 7HUANG J, I.IN T, LIU H, et al. Laparoseopic radical cystectomy with orthotopie ileal neobladder for bladder cancer: oncologic re suits of 171 cases with a median 3-year follow up[J]. Eur Urol, 2010,58(3) :442-449.
  • 8FRANKI O, NARDUCCI F, CHEREAU-EWALD E, et al. Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when ro botieally assisted laparoseopy for para-aoetie lymphadeneetomy is associated to a pelvic procedure[J]. Int J Gyneeol Canee, 2015,25 (2):331 336.
  • 9GANDAGLIA G, SUARDI N, GALLINA A, et al. Extended pel vic lymph node dissection does not affect erectile function reeov cry in patients treated with bilateral nerve-sparing radical prosta tectomy[J]. J Sex Med,2012,9(8) :2187-2194.
  • 10HOSHI S, HAYASHI N, KUROTA Y, et al. Comparison of semi-extended and standard lymph node dissextion in radical prostatectomy A single institute experience[J]. Mol Clin Oncol, 2015,3(5) :1085-1087.

共引文献11

同被引文献84

引证文献9

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部