期刊文献+

公共创新:财富创造与创新治理 被引量:11

Common Innovation: Wealth Creation and Innovation Governance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 创新为财富创造做出了巨大的贡献,但同时也具有较强的破坏性。本文针对创新的破坏性,引入了公共创新的范式。从真实财富创造的角度详细介绍了公共创新范式的提出、概念与意义,并针对中国的特殊情境解释了公共创新范式在中国的拓展与应用。继而,结合中国的情境和公共创新的特点,解释了中国公共创新过程中面临的问题,并引入了创新公地的概念。最后,对创新公地概念进行了详细的阐述,并解释了创新公地的治理问题,为公共创新公地的治理设计提供了参考和借鉴。本文为中国的创新范式转型提供了一个新的途径,并为后续的创新发展提供了一个可供借鉴的参考框架。 Innovation has made a great contribution to wealth creation, but it is also highly disruptive, base on the disruptive side of innovation, we introduced the concept of common innovation.In this paper, we introduced the concept and significance of common innovation, from the perspective of real wealth creation, and explained the expansion and application of common innovation in Chinese special context. After that, according to Chinese context and the characteristics of common innovation, we illustrated problems in the process of common innovation in China,and introduced the concept of innovation commons. Finally, we illustrated the concept of innovation commons, and explained the problems of the governance of innovation commons, providing a reference and guidance for the governance design of public innovation commons. By this research, we provide a new way for China’s innovation transformation and make a referential framework for innovation development in the future.
作者 陈劲 李佳雪 Chen Jin;Li Jiaxue(School of Economics and Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084;Research Center for Technological Innovation,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084)
出处 《创新科技》 2020年第1期1-9,共9页 Innovation science and technology
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“建设世界科技创新强国的战略比较与实现路径研究”(17ZDA082) 国家社会科学基金重点项目“全球价值链发展变化与我国创新驱动发展战略研究”(15AZD005)。
关键词 公共创新 创新公地 创新治理 common innovation innovation commons innovation governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献153

  • 1刘世锦.中国经济改革的推进方式及其中的公共选择问题[J].经济研究,1993,28(10):27-35. 被引量:22
  • 2陈劲.从技术引进到自主创新的学习模式[J].科研管理,1994,15(2):32-34. 被引量:237
  • 3Adam, B. & Groves, C., 2011, "Futures Tended: Care and Future-oriented Responsibility", Bulletin of Science, Technol- ogy & Society, Vol.31, No. 1, pp. 17-27.
  • 4Astin, A. W., 2012,Assessment for Excellence : The Philos- ophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Educa- tion, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • 5Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C. & Guston, D. H., 2008, 38 Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnoiogy : Foresight, Engage- ment and Integration.
  • 6Beesley, L. G., 2003, "Science Policy in Changing Times : Are Governments Poised to Take Full Advantage of an Institution in Transition", Research Policy, Vol.32, No.8, pp. 1519~ 1531.
  • 7Blok, V., 2014, "Look Who's Talking: Responsible Inno-ration, the Paradox of Dialogue and the Voice of the Other in Communication and Negotiation Processes", Journal of Responsi- ble Innovation, Vol.1, No.2, pp.171-190.
  • 8Borm, P. J., Robbins, D., Haubold, S., Kuhlbusch, T., Fissan, H., Donaldson & Oberdorster, E., 2006, "The Potential Risks of Nanomaterials: A Review Carried out for ECETOC" , Particle and Fibre Toxicology, Vol.3, No. 11, pp. 1-35.
  • 9Braun, K., Moore, A., Herrmann, S. L. & K~nninger, S., 2010, "Science Governance and the Politics of Proper Talk:Gov- ernmental Bioethics as a New Technology of Reflexive Govern- ment", Economy and Society, Vol.39, No.4, pp.510-533.
  • 10Briggle, A., 2010, A Rich Bioethics, South Bend : Univer- sity of Notre Dame Press.

共引文献232

同被引文献208

引证文献11

二级引证文献414

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部