摘要
担保物权存续期限是我国《担保法》遗留的一个法律漏洞。虽然《担保法司法解释》和《物权法》都试图填补此漏洞,但由于担保物权在经过特定期间后是否消灭仍不明确,司法实践和学说长期难以统一。《民法典物权编(草案)》两次审议稿和《民法典(草案)》审议稿继承《物权法》第202条对抵押权存续期限规定的做法不可取。担保物权是定限物权和有期限物权,基于促进担保物流通的法政策考量,担保物权应当有存续期限。尽管担保物权的存续期限与被担保债权的诉讼时效没有法理上的因果关系,但二者在规范构造上有相当的牵连关系。未来的《中华人民共和国民法典》应在完善《物权法》抵押权存续期限规定的基础上,将之提至担保物权总则部分并与担保物权的法定消灭事由规范融合。
The duration of the secured property rights is a legal loophole left by China's Guarantee Law.Although both Judicial Interpretation of the Guarantee Law and Property Law attempt to fill this loophole,it is still unclear whether the secured property rights have been eliminated after a certain period of time,and judicial practice and doctrine are difficult to unify for a long time.It is not advisable to inherit the provisions of article 202 of Property Law for the duration of the mortgage rights in the two deliberations of Civil Code of Property Rights(Draft)and Civil Code(Draft).The secured property rights are the fixed property right and the fixed-term property right.Under the legal policy of promoting property circulation,the survival of the secured property rights shall be subject to the time limit.Although there is no legal causal relationship between the duration of the secured property rights and the legality of the secured claims,the two have a considerable relationship in the normative structure.The future Civil Code of People's Republic of China shall,on the basis of perfecting the provisions of Property Law on the duration of the mortgage,bring it to the general part of the secured property rights and integrate it with the statutory elimination of the secured property rights.
作者
杨秋宇
YANG Qiu-yu(Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
出处
《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期83-90,共8页
Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金
国家社会科学基金青年资助项目(19CFX049)
关键词
担保物权
存续期限
制度构造
《中华人民共和国民法典(草案)》
secured property rights
duration of existence
institutional structure
Civil Code of People's Republic of China(Draft)