《布拉迪莫传奇》中女性“他者”的困境:反叛与共谋被引量：1

Dilemma of Women as the Other in A Bloodsmoor Romance:Rebellion and Complicity

下载PDF

导出

摘要美国当代作家欧茨的《布拉迪莫传奇》一般认为是对十九世纪传奇小说的戏仿和修订,表达女性反叛的主题。文章关注作品中五姐妹反叛父权家庭规约的同时,又默然内化了男性对其“他者”的期待和要求,故而最终接受了这一期待——选择回归婚姻。分析从叙事话语和故事情节两个层面展开,话语层代表父权意识形态的女性叙述者的叙事权威与人物逃离叙事掌控之间的相互抗衡;故事层面五姐妹试图挣脱父权男权社会中对女性“他者”的身份塑形,却成为既与男权“共谋”又与之对立的“他者”,这两个层面折射出女性在父权中心社会的尴尬困境。 Joyce Carol Oates’A Bloodsmoor Romance was generally criticized as a parody and revision of the domestic romance in the nineteenth century in terms of its rebellious feminist concerns.Resorting to a close analysis of the narrator’s narrative authority and plot development in the novel,this paper reveals the female characters’dilemma in their rebellions against the patriarchal order.It demonstrates from two dimensions that firstly,with respect to narrative discourse,the female narrator’s narrative authority,representing the patriarchal order,is countered by the characters’ever-escaping from the narrative control;secondly,the female characters’attempts to break free from the patriarchal order’s shaping them as the Other,however,ends up in complicity with it by accepting the conventional role of marriage.

作者薛丽 XUE Li(School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

机构地区北京师范大学外国语言文学学院

出处《合肥工业大学学报（社会科学版）》 2020年第1期64-70,共7页 Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)

关键词欧茨《布拉迪莫传奇》戏仿反叛共谋 Oates A Bloodsmoor Romance parody rebellion complicity

分类号 I712.074 [文学—其他各国文学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1金莉.美国女权运动·女性文学·女权批评[J].美国研究,2009,23(1):62-79. 被引量：63

二级参考文献26

1Abigail Adams, "Letter to John Adams," March 31, 1776, TheOxford Book of Women's Writing in the United States, ed. , Linda Wagner-Martin and Cathy N. Davidson, (Oxford.. Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 491.
2Margaret Fuller, Woman in the Nineteenth Century (1845) (New York: Norton, 1971), p. 37.
3Deborah L. Madsen, Feminist Theory and Literary Practice (London: Pluto Press, 2000), p. 6.
4Betty Friedan, The Feminine Mystique, with a new introduction and epilogue by the author (New York, N.Y. ~ Dell Pub. Co. , 1983).
5Deborah L. Madsen, Feminist Theory,and Literary Practice (London: Pluto Press, 2000), p. 9.
6Susan Archer Mann and Douglas J. Huffman, "The Decentering of Second Wave Feminism and the Rise of the Third Wave," Science & Society, Vol. 69, No. 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 56-91.
7Susan Archer Mann and Douglas J. Huffman, "The Decentering of Second Wave Feminism and the Rise of the Third Wave," Science & Society, Vol. 69, No. 1, Jan. 2005, p. 58.
8Bell Hooks, Feminist Theory, fromMargin to Center ( Boston: South End Press, 1984).
9Susan Archer Mann and Douglas J. Huffman, "The Decentering of Second Wave Feminism and the Rise Of the Third Wave," Science & Society, Vol. 69, No. 1, Jan. 2005, p. 86.
10Elaine Showalter, Sister's Choice: Tradition and Change in American Women's Writing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).