期刊文献+

社交网站使用强度和社会比较对妒忌情绪的影响 被引量:3

Effects of Social Networking Sites Use Intensity and Social Comparison on Jealousy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:调查大学生社交网络的使用现状,考察社交网站的使用强度和社会比较对大学生产生妒忌情绪的影响。方法:此研究在现有研究的基础上,使用社交网站使用强度问卷、妒忌问卷、社会比较量表,对肇庆学院随机抽取的500名在校大学生进行调查研究。结果:社交网站的使用情况在性别上存在显著差异,即男生最经常使用的社交软件的好友数量显著多于女生,女生在每天平均花费在社交网站的时间、情感投入程度都显著高于男生。向上社会比较不存在性别和文化水平差异,但在城镇和农村存在着显著差异,即城镇向上社会比较倾向高于农村。社交网站使用强度、向上社会比较与妒忌情绪两两之间存在着正相关(p<0.01)。 Objective: To investigate the current situation of college students’ use of social networking sites, and to investigate the impact of the use of social networking sites and social comparisons on jealousy among college students. Methods: Based on the existing research, this study used social networking sites use intensity questionnaires, jealousy questionnaires, and social comparison scales to investigate 500 college students randomly selected from Zhaoqing University. Results: There is a significant gender difference in the use of social networking sites, that is, the number of friends who use social software most often is significantly higher for boys than for girls, and the average time and emotional investment of girls on social networking sites are significantly higher than boys. There is no difference in gender and cultural level in upward society, but there are significant differences in urban and rural areas, that is, urban society tends to be higher than rural society. There was a positive correlation between the use of social networking sites, upward social comparison, and jealousy(p <0.01).
作者 薛滢 郑静宜 刘雨婷 洪沛金 XUE Ying;ZHENG Jing-yi;LIU Yu-ting;HONG Pei-jin(Zhaoqing University,Zhaoqing 526061,China)
机构地区 肇庆学院
出处 《价值工程》 2020年第6期227-230,共4页 Value Engineering
基金 2018年肇庆学院大学生创新创业训练计划省级项目《社交网络对中国当代大学生人际交往关系的影响》的研究成果(项目编号:201810580038)。
关键词 大学生 社交网站 社会比较 妒忌情绪 college students social networking sites social comparison jealousy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献163

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3754
  • 2Morse S & Gergen K. Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of the self, Journal of personality and social psychology.1970,27:297 - 323.
  • 3Brown J D,Novick N J ,Kelley A L, & Richards J M, When Gulliver travels: social context, psychological closeness, and self-appraisals.Journal of personality and .social psychology, 1992.62:712- 727.
  • 4Tajfel H & Turner J C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict,In W G Austin and S Worchel (Eds). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, Cal : Brooks/Cole. 1979.
  • 5Turner J C. M A Hogg, P J Oades. S D Reicher and M Wetherell.Rediscovering the Social Group: A self-categorization theory.Blackwell. Oxford and New York. 1987.
  • 6Brewere M B. The social self:on being the same and different at the same time. personality and social psychology Bulletion, 1991,17:475- 482.
  • 7Brewer M B & Weber j G. Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison, journal of personality and social psychology, 1994,66 : 268 - 275.
  • 8Triandis H C. The self and social behavior in different cultural contexts, psychological Review, 1989,96 : 506 - 520.
  • 9郭小艳,王振宏.积极情绪的概念、功能与意义[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):810-815. 被引量:310
  • 10翟学伟.中国人在社会行为上是什么取向的[J].社会心理研究,1994,4:40-47.

共引文献185

同被引文献47

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部