认罪认罚从宽制度中的量刑建议

On the Sentencing Suggestion in the Leniency System for Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment

从世界范围看,量刑建议愈渐具有重要地位是当下刑事司法制度公力协商模式悄然风靡的结果。随着我国认罪认罚从宽制度的确立,检察机关量刑建议的重要性也日益彰显,成为牵动认罪案件诉讼程序运行的关键部分。认罪认罚案件中量刑建议制度产生了较多新的实质变化。新形势下,精准刑与幅度刑在认罪案件量刑建议中均具有了新的价值意义,以精准为主、幅度为辅是较为妥当的量刑建议内容模式。量刑建议的效力问题是落实认罪认罚从宽的关键所在,对于《刑事诉讼法》第201条的规定,应当要有较为清晰的认知,包括量刑建议的效力场域、辅助参考到主要依据的转变、一般应当的规范表述、调整量刑建议的规范缘由、量刑建议异议处理程序。对这些问题的充分有效探讨有助于指导认罪认罚从宽制度实践。

From a global perspective,the increasingly important status of sentencing suggestion is an inevitable consequence of the current public consultation model of the criminal justice system. With the establishment of the leniency system for pleading guilty and accepting punishment in our country,the sentencing suggestion from the prosecutor has become increasingly important and has gradually become a key part of the proceedings of confession cases. The sentencing suggestion system has produced many new substantive changes. Under the new situation,both precision and range punishment have new values in the sentencing suggestion of confession cases. Accuracy-based and range-supplemented model is a more appropriate content model for the sentencing suggestion. The effectiveness of sentencing suggestion is the key to implementing the leniency for pleading guilty and accepting punishment. There should be a clearer understanding of the provisions of Article 201 of the Criminal Procedure Law,including the effectiveness of sentencing suggestion,the auxiliary references to the main basis,the"generally should"normative expression,the normative reasons for sentencing suggestion,and the sentencing suggestion objection procedure. A full and effective discussion of these issues is the key aspect to guiding the leniency system for pleading guilty and accepting punishment.