期刊文献+

MOEA/D线性插入方向向量策略研究 被引量:4

Improved MOEA/D with Linear Search Direction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 MOEA/D具有良好的收敛性、均匀的分布性、求解效率高等优点,普遍应用于求解多目标优化问题.然而对于Pareto前端复杂的多目标优化问题,预先设定均匀的权重向量并不能够维持Pareto最优解集的良好分布性.本文,首先分析均匀分布的权重向量、均匀分布的搜索方向二者与均匀分布的解集之间的关系,提出一种新的权重向量设置方式;其次基于进化过程中解集的分布,提出线性插入搜索方向策略,并将其转换为对应的权重向量,同时在MOEA/D中周期性应用该策略调整搜索方向,获取分布均匀的解集;最后将该算法在WFG系列测试问题上进行性能测试,并采用世代距离指标(GD)、Spacing指标(S)、超体积指标(HV)对算法收敛性和多样性进行对比分析,实验结果表明,与原始的MOEA/D、使用均匀分布的搜索方向MOEA/D、使用预处理的M OEA/D、M OEA/D-DU相比,改进的算法求出解集的多样性极大提高,收敛性明显增强,解集的整体质量显著提高. The multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition(MOEA/D),which has a strong search ability,efficient fitness evolution,and good convergence merits,has been widely used in solving multi-objective optimization problem.In the recent studies about MOEA/D,the uniform distribution weight vectors has been used to obtain uniform distribution Pareto optimal solutions.However,using uniform weight vector cannot maintain the good distribution of the Pareto optimal solution when the Pareto Front(PF)of multi-objective problem is complicated(such as the discontinuous PF or the uneven distribution PF).In this paper,we first analyze the relationship between uniform weight vectors and uniform solutions to evaluate the impact of uniform search directions on uniform solutions.Then a new setting weight vectors strategy is proposed.Secondly,According to distribution of solution set during the evolution,the approach of inserting search direction linearly is given.Meanwhile,the weight vectors are converted,and the proposed approach is applied in MOEA/D periodicity,by this way,it can achieve the uniform solutions by periodically adjusting the search directions.In the experiment,we test the performance of the strategy on the WFG problems.The generational distance(GD),spacing(S),hyper-volume(HV)indicators are used to evaluate the performance of the different algorithms.Compared with the original algorithm MOEA/D,the MOEA/D with per-uniform search directions,the MOEA/D using the pre-organization procedure and MOEA/D-DU,experimental results show that the algorithm adapting the inserting search direction linearly policy achieve greatly improvement for the diversity performance,it performs better,also the convergence of the algorithm is obvious enhanced,the total quality of solutions is significantly improved.
作者 林梦嫚 王丽萍 周欢 JIN Xing;LI Ming-chu;SUN Xiao-mei;GUO Cheng(School of Software,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116620,China)
出处 《小型微型计算机系统》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期236-243,共8页 Journal of Chinese Computer Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61572095,61877007)资助 浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY13F030010,LZ13P020002)资助.
关键词 多目标优化 MOEA/D 均匀分布 线性插入 multi-objective optimization MOEA/D uniform distribution linear interpolation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal A, Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197.
  • 2Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L. SPEA2: improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial Problems. Athens, Greece: CIMNE, 2001. 95-100.
  • 3Deb K, Saxena D K. Searching for Pareto-optimal solutions through dimensionality reduction for certain largedimensional multi-objective optimization problems. In: Pro- ceedings of the 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Vancouver, Canada: IEEE, 2006. 3353-3360.
  • 4Jaimes A L, Coello C A C, Chakraborty D. Objective reduction using a feature selection technique. In: Proceedings of the LOth Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. New York, USA: ACM, 2008. 673-680.
  • 5Adra SF, Fleming P J. Diversity management in evolutionary many-objective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2011, 15(2): 183-195.
  • 6Li M Q, Yang S X, Liu X H. Shift-based density estimation for Pareto-based algorithms in many-objective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2014, 18(3): 348-365.
  • 7Sato H, Aguirre H E, Tanaka K. Pareto partial dominance MOEA and hybrid archiving strategy included CDAS in many-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE, 2010. 1-8.
  • 8Jaimes A L, Coello C A C, Aguirre H, Tanaka K. Objective space partitioning using conflict information for solving many-objective problems. Information Sciences, 2014, 268: 305-327.
  • 9Deb K, Mohan M, Mishra S. Evaluating the s-domination based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for a quick computation of Pareto-optimal solutions. Evolutionary Computation, 2005, 13(4): 501-525.
  • 10Kukkonen S, Lampinen J. Ranking-dominance and manyobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Singapore: IEEE, 2007. 3983-3990.

共引文献41

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部