期刊文献+

高中生父母教养方式与非自杀性自伤的关系:性别的调节作用 被引量:13

Relationship between parenting styles and non-suicidal self-injury in senior students: the moderating role of gender
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的调查高中生非自杀性自伤(NSSI)的发生现状及性别在父母教养方式与NSSI的关系中的调节作用。方法采用一般社会人口资料调查表、青少年自我伤害问卷、父母教养方式问卷(PBI)对641名(男308名,女333名;15~18岁)高二学生进行调查。结果高二学生NSSI的检出率为32.1%,其中男生检出率为30.2%,女生检出率为33.9%,两者间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在5种NSSI行为方式、1种行为原因和1种外部刺激事件上男女生之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Logistic分层逐步回归显示,父亲关爱(OR=0.926)是高二学生NSSI的保护因素,性别调节了母亲控制与NSSI的关系,母亲控制(OR=1.102)是女生NSSI的危险因素。结论高二学生NSSI的发生较普遍且行为方式多样,性别在父母教养方式与NSSI的关系中起到调节作用。 Objective To investigate the occurrence of non-suicidal self-injury(NSSI) among senior high school students and the moderating role of gender between parenting styles and NSSI. Methods A total of 641 grade two students(male 308, female 333, aged 15-18) were surveyed with general demographic information questionnaire, adolescent self-injury questionnaire and parental bonding instrument(PBI). Results The detection rate of NSSI was 32.1%, which was 30.2% among male and 33.9% among female students(P>0.05). There were differences between male and female students in 5 behavior patterns, 1 behavior cause and 1 external stimulus event of NSSI(P<0.05). Logistic stratified stepwise regression showed that paternal care(OR=0.926) was a protective factor for NSSI;gender moderated the relationship between maternal control and NSSI;maternal control(OR=1.102) was a risk factor for NSSI among female students. Conclusion The occurrence of NSSI is common and the behavior patterns are diverse in grade two students. Gender plays a moderating role in the relationship between parenting styles and NSSI.
作者 毛毳 李媛媛 厉萍 MAO Cui;LI Yuanyuan;LI Ping(Department of Nursing Psychology,School of Nursing,Shandong University,Jinan 250012,Shandong,China)
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第1期100-105,共6页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
关键词 高中生 非自杀性自伤 父母教养方式 性别 调节 Senior high school students Non-suicidal self-injury Parenting styles Gender Moderating
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1王妍.亲子依恋对儿童发展的影响分析及对策[J].教育现代化(电子版),2016(23):173-174. 被引量:2
  • 2侯静,陈会昌.依恋研究方法述评[J].心理发展与教育,2002,18(3):80-84. 被引量:37
  • 3徐毕卿 罗文倬 龙佛卫.双亲教养态度量表中文版之信效度研究[J].护理研究,1999,7(5):479-479.
  • 4Hadas W, Ofra M,Ruth S. Why are they lonely? Perceived quality of early relationships with parents,attachment,personality predispositions and loneliness in first-year university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 2006, 40 : 237-248.
  • 5Willem AA, Coby G, Walter V, et al. Convergent validity of the dimensions underlying the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) and the EMBU. Personality and Individal Differences, 1998,24(3): 341-345.
  • 6Gordon P, Hilary T, Brown LB. Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). www.blackdoginstitute.org.au.
  • 7Gordon P. The Parental Bonding Instrument. http://www. blackdoginstitute.org.au/research/tools/index.cf,#PBI.
  • 8Mohr S,Preisig M,Fenton BT,et al. Validation of the French version of the patental bonding instrument in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 1999,26:1065 - 1074.
  • 9Tomohiro N,Tetsuya S,Shigeki H,et al. Parental childrearing behavior as measured by Parental Bonding Instrument in a Japanese population:Factor structure and relationship to a lifetime history of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2000,57 : 229-234.
  • 10Dirk H,Herbert M,Sebastian B,et al. Empirical evidence for an invariant three-factor structure if the Parental Bonding Instrument in six European countries. Psychiatry Research, 2005,135 : 237-247.

共引文献104

同被引文献183

引证文献13

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部