期刊文献+

急性冠脉综合征患者PCI术后血浆CLEC-2水平与预后的关系 被引量:1

Relationship between plasma CLEC-2 level and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome after PCI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)后血浆C型凝集素样受体2(CLEC-2)水平与预后的关系。方法:前瞻性选取2016年1月至2017年6月在首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院就诊的150例ACS患者作为研究对象。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析CLEC-2评估ACS患者预后的最佳截断点。根据CLEC-2评价ACS患者预后的最佳截断点将患者分为高CLEC-2组(n=32)和低CLEC-2组(n=118)。采用酶联免疫吸附法检测ACS患者血浆中CLEC-2水平,并通过Cox回归分析其与ACS患者预后的关系。结果:血浆CLEC-2评价ACS患者预后的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.885(95%CI:0.812~0.958),最大约登指数为0.643,最佳截断点为158.63 pg/mL,敏感度为71.87%,特异度为92.37%。两组在年龄、ACS家族史、CLEC-2水平及左室射血分数(LVEF)等方面的差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。高CLEC-2组主要不良血管事件(MACE)的发生率明显高于低CLEC-2组(71.88%对7.63%,P<0.001),平均生存时间明显低于低CLEC-2组[17.25(15.40~19.10)个月对23.34(22.91~23.77)个月,P<0.001]。Cox单因素及多因素分析结果显示慢性阻塞性肺疾病及CLEC-2水平与ACS患者MACE发生密切相关。结论:高CLEC-2是ACS患者PCI后发生MACE的独立危险因素。 Objective:To investigate the relationship between plasma C-type lectin-like receptor 2(CLEC-2)level and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS)following percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods:A total of 150 patients with ACS who were admitted to Beijing Luhe Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 2016 to June 2017 were prospectively included.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to determine the best cutoff point for CLEC-2 to evaluate the prognosis in patients with ACS.The patients were divided into high CLEC-2 group(n=32)and low CLEC-2 group(n=118),according to the best cutoff point value of CLEC-2.The plasma CLEC-2 level was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.Cox regression was used to analysis the relationship between CLEC-2 level and the prognosis of patients with ACS.Results:The area under ROC curve(AUC)was 0.885(95%CI 0.812-0.958).The Youden index was the largest(0.390)when CLEC-2 level was 158.63 pg/mL,and the sensitivity was 71.87%,and the specificity was 92.37%.There were significant differences in age,ACS family history,CLEC-2 level,and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)between the two groups(all P<0.05).The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)in the high CLEC-2 group was higher than that in the low CLEC-2 group(71.88%vs.7.63%,P<0.001),and the survival time of the high CLEC-2 group was lower than that of the low CLEC-2 group(17.25(15.40,19.10)months vs.23.34(22.91,23.77)months,P<0.001).Cox univariate and multivariate analysis showed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and CLEC-2 levels were closely associated with MACE in patients with ACS.Conclusions:High CLEC-2 is an independent risk factor for MACE after PCI in patients with ACS.
作者 郝明辉 郭明 唐宇 杨婧 柳子静 闫蕊 李萍 郭金成 HAO Minghui;GUO Ming;TANG Yu;YANG Jing;LIU Zijing;YAN Rui;LI Ping;GUO Jincheng(Department of Cardiology,Beijing Luhe Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 101100,China)
出处 《国际心血管病杂志》 2020年第2期118-122,共5页 International Journal of Cardiovascular Disease
基金 北京市卫计委首发专项(2018-2-7082)。
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 经皮冠状动脉介入术 C型凝集素样受体2 预后 Acute coronary syndrome Percutaneous coronary intervention C-type lectin-like receptor 2 Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献61

  • 1柯元南,陈纪林.不稳定性心绞痛和非ST段抬高心肌梗死诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(4):295-304. 被引量:2108
  • 2Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 3Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 4Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 5Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 6Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 7Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 8Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 9Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 10Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.

共引文献578

同被引文献18

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部