期刊文献+

医护人员对危重症患者院内转运的认知及实施现状调查 被引量:16

Cognition and implementation of intra-hospital transport of medical staff for critical patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解临床医护人员对危重症患者院内转运的认知及实施现状,分析目前医护人员对危重症患者院内转运认知及实施现状的差异,为改善医护人员院内转运现状提供依据。方法采用便利抽样法于2018年12月1—20日选取荆州市某三甲医院306名临床医护人员作为研究对象。利用问卷的方式对医护人员进行危重症患者院内转运认知及实施现状的调查,采用t检验对转运认知与实施现状情况进行比较。结果医护人员对危重症患者院内转运认知得分(120.98±17.66)分,其中转运交接分数最高,为(28.41±3.40)分;组织管理分数最低,为(22.70±3.94)分。实施现状得分(105.56±25.42)分,其中转运交接维度分数最高,为(26.41±4.91)分;教育培训分数最低,为(18.37±5.63)分。各条目认知得分与实施现状得分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论医护人员在转运认知方面分数均高于执行现状分数。医院管理者可根据执行现状的调查结果,针对该现状提出相应的管理条例及改进措施,保证危重症患者的院内转运安全。 Objective To understand the cognition of medical staff and implementation of intrahospital transport for critical patients and analyze the differences between cognition and implementation so as to provide a basis for improving the intra-hospital transport by medical staff.Methods From 1st to 20th of December 2018,We selected 306 medical staffs at a ClassⅢGrade A hospital in Jinzhou as subjects by convenience sampling.The cognition and implementation of intra-hospital transport of medical staff for critical patients were investigated with the questionnaire and compared using t test.Results The score of medical staffs'cognition on intra-hospital transport for critical patients was(120.98±17.66);the highest score was(28.41±3.40)in transport handover,and the lowest score was(22.70±3.94)in organization management.The implementation status was(105.56±25.42);the dimension of transport handover had the highest score(26.41±4.91)and dimension of education training had the lowest score(18.37±5.63).There were statistical differences between the item scores of cognition and scores of status(P<0.01).Conclusions Scores of medical staffs'cognition on transport were higher than scores of implementation status.Hospital managers can put forward administration regulations and improvement measures according to investigation results of implementation status to ensure the safety of critical patients in intra-hospital transport.
作者 刘晁含 付沫 丁娟 Liu Chaohan;Fu Mo;Ding Juan(Nursing Faculty,Yangtze University Health Science Center,Jingzhou 434023,China;Nursing Department,Jingzhou Central Hospital of Hubei Province,Jingzhou 434020,China;Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit,Central Hospital of Hubei Province,Jingzhou 434020,China)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2020年第2期183-186,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 湖北省卫生健康委员会2019-2020年度科研课题(WJ2019M084)。
关键词 认知 现状 危重症患者 院内转运 医护人员 Cognition Status Critical patients Intra-hospital transport Medical staff
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献54

  • 1冯世萍,宋培文.危重新生儿转运系统的运行及管理[J].护理管理杂志,2006,6(9):54-55. 被引量:3
  • 2Helen Hoesing,李明子.护理与病人安全[J].中国护理管理,2007,7(1):23-24. 被引量:148
  • 3王佩燕.独特的急诊临床思维——降阶梯式鉴别诊断[J].世界急危重病医学杂志,2007,4(3):1828-1828. 被引量:56
  • 4Day M W. Transport of the critically ill:the northwest med star experience[J]. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am, 2005,17(2) :183 190.
  • 5Siegel N, Bird E. Hazards of intra-hospital transport. HEAD,2008,1 (4):133-136.
  • 6Stacey J, Venn R. Recently published papers: clunk- click every trip,smile,but don't stop for a drink on the way. Critical Care,2004(6):408-410.
  • 7中华医学会重症医学分会.中国重症患者转运指南(2010).中国危重病急救医学杂志,2010,6(22):328330.
  • 8Kue R, Brown P, Ness C, et al. Adverse clinical events during intrahospital transport by a specialized team:preliminary report.Am J Crit Care, 2011,20(2):153-161.
  • 9Lahner D, Nikolic A, Marhofer P, et al. Incidence of complications in intrahospital transport of critically ill patients-experience in an Austrian university hospital. Wien Klin Wochenschr,2007,119(13-14):412-416.
  • 10方方.护理风险管理在急诊危重患者院内转运中的应用[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2008,23(5):22-23. 被引量:71

共引文献449

同被引文献144

引证文献16

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部