期刊文献+

经腹腹腔镜肾癌根治与经腰腹腔镜根治术临床对比研究 被引量:3

Clinical Comparison of Transabdominal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy and Transbronchial Radical Resection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经腹腹腔镜肾癌根治与经腰腹腔镜根治术的临床效果。方法方便选取2015年1月—2018年2月该院肾癌患者60例,按治疗方案分经腹组(n=30)、经腰组(n=30)。经腰组予以经腰腹腔镜根治术,经腹组予以经腹腹腔镜肾癌根治术。对比两组手术情况(手术时间、术中失血量、禁食时间、住院时间)、并发症发生率、随访1年观察预后情况。结果经腹组手术时间较经腰组长(t=2.295,P<0.05);经腹组术中失血量、禁食时间、住院时间与经腰组对比,差异无统计学意义(t1=0.398、t2=0.506、t3=0.299,P>0.05);经腹组并发症发生率6.67%(2/30)与经腰组3.33%(1/30)对比,差异无统计学意义(χ^2=0.000,P>0.05);随访1年,无脱落病例,均有效随访;均无病死病例,经腹组未出现远端转移,无复发,经腰组发生肺转移1例,为T2期患者,以确切概率法计算,经腹组转移率0.00%(0/30)与经腰组3.33%(1/30)对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论经腹腹腔镜根治术与经腰腹腔镜根治术治疗肾癌均能获得良好手术效果,经腰入路手术时间略短,经腹入路转移风险更易控制,临床可根据实际情况选择手术方案。 Objective To investigate the clinical effects of transabdominal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and transbronchial radical resection.Methods Convenient selection 60 patients with renal cell carcinoma in the hospital from January 2015 to February 2018 were enrolled.According to the treatment plan,the abdominal group(n=30)and the lumbar group(n=30)were divided.The lumbar laparoscopic radical operation was performed in the lumbar group,and the abdominal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed in the abdominal group.The operation status(surgery time,intraoperative blood loss,fasting time,hospitalization time),complication rate,and prognosis were observed at 1 year follow-up.Results The operation time of the abdominal group was longer than that of the lumbar group(t=2.295,P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in blood loss,fasting time,hospitalization time and the waist group during the transabdominal group(t1=0.398,t2=0.506,t3=0.299,P>0.05);the incidence of complications in the abdominal group was 6.67%(2/30)compared with 3.33%(1/30)in the lumbar group.There was no statistically significant difference(χ^2=0.000,P>0.05).Follow-up 1 year,no cases of shedding,all effective follow-up;no cases of death,no distal metastasis,no recurrence,1 case of lung metastasis through the lumbar group,T2 patients,calculated by exact probability method.There was no statistically significant difference between the transabdominal group transfer rate of 0.00%(0/30)and the transthoracic group of 3.33%(1/30)(P>0.05).Conclusion Transabdominal laparoscopic radical surgery and transbronchial radical resection for renal cell carcinoma can achieve good surgical results.The operation time of the lumbar approach is slightly shorter,and the risk of trans-abdominal approach is easier to control.The clinical plan can be selected according to the actual situation.
作者 韩超 HAN Chao(Department of Urology,First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing,Zhaoqing,Guangdong Province,526040 China)
出处 《中外医疗》 2020年第1期54-56,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 经腹腹腔镜根治术 经腰腹腔镜根治术 肾癌 并发症 Transabdominal laparoscopic radical surgery Radial laparoscopic radical surgery Kidney cancer Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献63

  • 1谢德红,陈大志,李鹏,李立新,樊华,贺强.腹腔镜超声在腹腔镜肝胆手术中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(1):46-48. 被引量:8
  • 2马潞林,黄毅,田晓军,侯小飞,赵磊,卢剑,洪锴.后腹腔镜根治性肾癌切除术[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):157-159. 被引量:76
  • 3Rane A, Kommu S, Eddy B, Abe C, Bonkat G, Reich O, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel laparoscopic port (R-port) and evolution of the single laparoscopie port procedure (SLiPP)[J]. J Endourol,2007,21(Suppl 1) :A22-A23.
  • 4Autorino R,Cadeddu J A, Desai M M, Gettman M, Gill I S, Kavoussi L R, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural or- ifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical anal- ysis of the literature[J]. Eur Urol,2011,59:26-45.
  • 5Kurien A, Rajapurkar S, Sinha L, Mishra S, Ganpule A, Muthu V,et al. First prize: Standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephreetomy: a ran- domized comparative study[J]. J Endourol, 2011, Z5 : 365-370.
  • 6Woldrich J M, Holmes N, Palazzi-Churas K, Alagiri M, DeCam- bre M,Kaplan G,et al. Comparison of laparoendoscopie single- site, conventional laparoscopic, and open nephrectomy in a pedi- atric population[J]. Urology, 2011,78 : 74-77.
  • 7Stein R J, Berger A K, Brandina R, Patel N S, Canes D, Irwin B H, et al. Laparoendoscopie single-site pyeloplasty: a comparison with the standard laparoseopie teehnique[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 107:811-815.
  • 8Dindo D, Demartines N,Clavien P A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and resuhs of a survey[J].Ann Surg,2004,240: 205-213.
  • 9Ljungberg B,Cowan N C, Hanbury D C, Hora M,Kuczyk M A, Merseburger A S,et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update[J]. Eur Urol,2010,58 : 398-406.
  • 10Gettman M T, Napper C, Corwin T S, Cadeddu J A. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: prospective assessment of impact of in- tact versus fragmented specimen removal on postoperative quality of life[J].J Endourol, 2002,16 : 23-26.

共引文献70

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部