期刊文献+

勿以恶小而为之:滑坡效应的心理机制及预防策略 被引量:5

The psychological mechanism and prevention strategy of slippery slope
下载PDF
导出
摘要 滑坡效应是指个体的不道德程度有随时间推移而逐渐加剧的倾向,即不道德行为具有反复性和渐进性。它广泛存在于个体自身层面以及人际互动过程中,会影响个体正常社会交往,甚至阻碍社会和谐健康发展。滑坡效应的研究方式包括实验者操纵法和自发性欺骗法,心理机制包括道德推脱、内隐偏差、自我非人化等,对应的干预措施包括提升预防定向动机和塑造积极的描述性社会规范。未来研究可从心理过程和生理机制的角度进一步探讨滑坡效应的适用范围、神经干预方式等。 The slippery slope effect refers to the degree of the individuals’ immorality to increase gradually over time, namely, the immoral behavior is repetitive and progressive. It widely exists in the behaviors of the individuals and interpersonal interaction, which will affect the normal social interaction between individuals, and even hinder the harmonious development of society. The research methods of the slippery slope effect include experimenter manipulation and spontaneous deception. There are at least three psychological mechanisms: moral disengagement, implicit biases, and self-dehumanization. The ways to intervene in this effect are promoting preventive orientation motivation and shaping positive descriptive social norms. Future studies should further explore the scope of the slippery slope effect and its neural intervention from the perspective of psychological processes and physiological mechanisms.
作者 欧红蕾 孙炳海 张文海 李伟健 OU Honglei;SUN Binghai;ZHANG Wenhai;LI Weijian(College of Teacher Education,Zhejiang Normal University;Tin Ka Ping Moral Education Research Center,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China;Mental Health Center,Yancheng Institute of Technology,Yancheng 224003,China;Institute of Psychology,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第4期650-660,共11页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 浙江省哲学社会科学新兴(交叉)学科重大扶持项目(ZZ323206060219015005)支持。
关键词 滑坡效应 道德推脱 内隐偏差 自我非人化 预防定向 描述性社会规范 slippery slope moral disengagement implicit biases self-dehumanization prevention focus descriptive norms
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1陈银飞,茅宁.从有限理性到有限道德论伦理决策的有限性[J].江苏大学学报(社会科学版),2009,11(6):89-92. 被引量:4
  • 2吴红梅,刘洪.西方伦理决策研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(12):48-55. 被引量:35
  • 3Mario Rizzo, Glen Whitman. The Camel's Nose Is in the Tent: Rules, Theories and Slippery Slopes [J]. UCLA Law Review, 2003, 51 (2): 539-592.
  • 4T. M. Jones. Ethical Decision Making hy Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-contingent Model[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16 (2): 366-395.
  • 5M. S. Baueus, J. P. Near. Can Illegal Corporate Behavior Be Predicted? An Event History Analysis [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34 (1): 9-36.
  • 6L. K. Trevino. Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-situation Interaction Model [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11 (1): 601-617.
  • 7O. C. Ferrell, J. Fraedrich, L. Fcrrell. Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases [M]. Houghton Mifflin, 2002.
  • 8Michael J. O'Fallon, Kenneth D. Butterfield. A Review of The Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996-2003 [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2005, (59): 375 - 413.
  • 9Marie A. McKendall, John A. Wagner. Motive, Opportunity, Choice, and Corporate Illegality[J]. Organization Science, 1997, 8 (6): 624-647.
  • 10Grant T. Harris, Marnie E. Rice, A. Catherine. Cormier Psychopathy and Violent Recidivism[J]. Law and Human Behavior, 1991, 15 (6): 625-637.

同被引文献87

引证文献5

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部