期刊文献+

MSCT对肾脏嗜酸细胞腺瘤和透明细胞癌的鉴别诊断价值 被引量:7

Differentiation of renal oncocytoma and clear-cell renal cell carcinomas by MSCT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨多层螺旋CT(Multi-slice spiral computed tomography,MSCT)四期扫描对肾脏嗜酸细胞腺瘤(Renal oncocytoma,RO)和透明细胞癌(Clear-cell renal cell carcinomas,ccRCC)的鉴别诊断价值。方法:搜集因肾脏占位行肾脏CT平扫和三期增强扫描患者79例共80枚瘤灶,经术后病理证实RO 29例,ccRCC 50例,并回顾性分析两组病例的影像表现,采用SPSS 19.0软件对肿瘤CT值、校正CT值、皮质期与实质期CT差值及增强廓清率进行独立样本t检验分析。采用Fisher确切概率法对肿瘤部位、形态、平扫特点、强化程度、强化方式、皮质期与实质期强化CT值差异、节段增强反转等征象进行统计分析。结果:RO和ccRCC皮质期CT值、皮质期校正CT值、皮质期与实质期CT差值和增强廓清率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),平扫、实质期、排泄期CT值校正CT值差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。中央星状低密度影、强化程度、强化均匀度、轮辐状强化、皮质期与实质期强化CT值差异及节段增强反转等征象差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),部位、形态、钙化,病灶周边絮状和条索状影等征象差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在MSCT多期扫描表现中,皮质期CT值、皮质期校正CT值、皮质期与实质期CT差值和增强廓清率、中央星状低密度影、强化程度、强化均匀度、轮辐状强化、皮质期与实质期强化CT值差异及节段增强反转等征象对于RO、ccRCC二者的鉴别具有重要价值。 Objective:To discuss the value of 4 phase MSCT in distinguishing renal oncocytoma(RO)from clear-cell renal cell carcinomas(ccRCC).Methods:Eighty masses from 79 patients underwent plain and enhanced CT scans due to renal mass.Twenty-nine cases of RO and fifty cases of ccRCC were confirmed by pathology.The imaging findings of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed.Attenuation values,corrected attenuation values in 4 phases,differences of the attenuation values between cortical phase and nephrographic phase,enhance clearance rates were analyzed by the Student’s t-test in SPSS 19.0 software.Locations,shapes,characteristics of plain scan,degrees of enhancement,patterns of enhancement,differences of the attenuation values between cortical phase and nephrographic phase and segmental enhancement inversions were analyzed by the Fisher’s exact test.Results:There were statistically significant differences between RO and ccRCC in attenuation values and corrected attenuation values in cortical phase,differences of the attenuation values between cortical phase and nephrographic phase,enhance clearance rates(P<0.05).The attenuation values and corrected attenuation values in unenhancement scan,nephrographic phase and excretory phase had no statistically significant differences between RO and ccRCC(P>0.05).There were statistically significant differences between RO and ccRCC in central stellate low densities,degrees of enhancement,homogeneous degree of enhancement,spoke-wheel-like enhancement,differences between the attenuation values in cortical phase and nephrographic phase and segmental enhancement inversions(P<0.05).Positions,shapes,calcifications,flocculent and streaky shadowings around the lesions had no statistically significant differences between RO and ccRCC(P>0.05).Conclusion:MSCT shows important value in preoperative distinguishing RO from ccRCC.The attenuation values and corrected attenuation values in cortical phase,differences between the attenuation values in cortical phase and nephrographic phase,enhancement clearance rates,central stellate low densities,degrees of enhancement,homogeneous degree of enhancement,spoke-wheel-like enhancement,differences between the attenuation values in cortical phase and nephrographic phase and segmental enhancement inversions can contribute to the differentiation of the RO and ccRCC.
作者 陈上超 陈宇 杨运俊 夏能志 林博丽 黄颖宝 CHEN Shang-chao;CHEN Yu;YANG Yun-jun;XIA Neng-zhi;LIN Bo-li;HUANG Ying-bao(Wenzhou Central Hospital,Wenzhou Zhejiang 325000,China;The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou Zhejiang 325000,China)
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS 2020年第2期123-127,共5页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
关键词 肾肿瘤 腺瘤 嗜酸性 腺癌 透明细胞 体层摄影术 X线计算机 Kidney neoplasms Adenoma,acidophil Adenocarcinoma,clear cell Tomography,X-ray computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献34

  • 1王晓琰,陈克敏.肾嗜酸性细胞瘤一例[J].放射学实践,2004,19(11):855-855. 被引量:1
  • 2李清海,严福华,徐鹏举,侯君,周建军,周梅玲.肾嫌色细胞癌的影像表现与病理对照分析[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(3):259-263. 被引量:42
  • 3张洁,马大庆,贺文,张忠嘉,胡玉敏,徐岩.肾脏嗜酸细胞腺瘤和肾癌的螺旋CT鉴别诊断[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(5):718-720. 被引量:39
  • 4Ruppert-Kohlmayr A J,Uggowitzer M,Meissnitzer T,et al.Differentiation of renal clear cell carcinoma and renal papillary carcinoma using quantitative CT enhancement parameters.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2004,183:1387-1391.
  • 5Lopez-Beltran A,Scarpelli M,Montironi R,et al.2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults.Eur Urol,2006,49:798-805.
  • 6Delahunt B,Bethwaite P B,Nacey J N.Outcome prediction for renal cell carcinoma:evaluation of prognostic factors for turnouts divided according to histological subtype.Pathology,2007,39:459-465.
  • 7Imura J,Iehikawa K,Takeda J,et al.Muhilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma:a clinicopathological,immuno-and lectin histochemical study of nine cases.APMIS,2004,112:163-191.
  • 8Teodorovich O V,Ternovoi S K,Vlasova I S,et al.Comparative analysis of modern combined methods in diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma.Urologiia,2006(5):3-6,11.
  • 9Kim J K,Kim T K,Ahn H J,et al.Differentiation of subtypes of renal cell carcinoma on helical CT scans.AIR Am J Roentgenol,2002,178:1499-1506.
  • 10Volpe A,Patard JJ. Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma [ J].World J Urol,2010,28(3) :319,327.

共引文献87

同被引文献44

引证文献7

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部