农户生计风险中英文文献对比研究——基于文献计量及可视化分析视角

A comparative study of Chinese and English literatures on farmers’ livelihood risk research——Based on bibliometrics and visualization analysis

世界银行提出,风险与脆弱性是贫困的核心根源。生计风险是持续性贫困人口形成以及脱贫人口返贫的重要原因。本文采用CiteSpace软件对现有生计风险研究的中英文文献进行分析,根据发文量变化特点分别对2007-2019年中文文献和2001—2019年英文文献划分为不同阶段,构建了关键词表和知识图谱,总结该领域的研究热点及其演进规律。结果表明,国内外涉及生计风险的研究存在研究起点、研究共同体的成熟度、研究热点、研究方法以及不同阶段研究视角几个方面的差异,主要结论有:①国外研究起步早且更深入,研究机构合作关系更紧密。国内研究尚处于起步和探索阶段,研究机构和作者之间的合作很少。②国外研究热点更多集中在各类风险及应对策略上,而国内集中在农户的生计及贫困问题上。③国外研究着重从气候变化和农户自身的风险应对能力两个维度研究生计风险——二者间的关系本质上是生计风险和农户生计恢复力的关系。国内相关研究从可持续生计起步,探索阶段主要围绕生计风险、生计资本和生计策略展开,研究视角相对单一,研究方法上更多借鉴国外的量化方法。

The World Bank suggests that risk and vulnerability are the core causes of poverty. Livelihood risk is a vital reason of the formation of persistent poor people and the re-poverty population. This paper uses CiteSpace software to analyze Chinese and English literatures of existing livelihood risk researches. According to volume ’s characteristics of publications, the 2007-2019 Chinese literatures and 2001-2019 English literatures are divided into different stages , as well as the key words list and knowledge maps are constructed. Research hotspots and evolution rules in this field are summarized in this paper. This study shows that domestic and foreign researches on livelihood risk differ in research starting points, the maturity of the research community, research hotspots, research methods and research perspectives in different stages.