指导性案例与抽象司法解释的互动及其完善

On Interaction between Guiding Cases and Abstract Judicial Interpretation and Its Perfection

指导性案例与抽象司法解释的互动,主要体现在制度、规则和法律方法三个层面。在制度层面,两者的制度成熟度差距较大,且相互衔接不足;在规则层面,两者的裁判规则供给能力之差距过于悬殊,具体的互动方式也存在一些瑕疵;在法律方法层面,两者在互动时对法律方法的运用还不够充分,相关标准亦有待明确。可以通过明确指导性案例的制度地位,并加强其与抽象司法解释的制度衔接、调整最高人民法院裁判规则供给结构并规范其具体方式、加强法律方法在两者互动中的运用并明确相关标准等路径,实现对指导性案例与抽象司法解释之互动模式的完善。

The interaction between guiding cases and abstract judicial interpretation is mainly reflected in three levels: system,rules and legal methods. At the system level,there is a huge gaf between the two systems in terms of system maturity and the connection between them is insufficient;at the rule level,the supply capacity of the two judgment rules is too wide,and there are some defects in the specific interaction mode;at the legal method level,the use of the two legal methods in the interaction is not enough,and the relevant standards need to be clarified. We can improve the interaction mode of guiding case and abstract judicial interpretation by clarifying the system status of guiding case,strengthening the system connection with abstract judicial interpretation,adjusting the supply structure of Supreme People’s Court’s judgment rules and regulating its specific ways,strengthening the application of legal methods in the interaction between the two and clarifying the relevant standards.