期刊文献+

“本根的创造性”与“意义的复合性”--从中西方创新差异看当代中国艺术评判基本标准 被引量:4

“Creativity Rooted in Tradition” and “Composite Meanings”: Comments on the Critical Standards of Chinese Contemporary Art from the Perspective of the Difference Existing in “Inventiveness” Between Chinese and Western Art
原文传递
导出
摘要 来自西方的当代艺术是以不断否定前行者的创新模式来加以推进的,而中国主流艺术仍主张在传承中加以继承发展,这恰是中西之别,也有古今之异。当代中国艺术的评判标准,第一是要有创造性,也就是自本土生根;第二是要呈现出复合性的意义。由此,所谓"本根的创造性"(creativity rooted in tradition)和"意义的复合性"(composite meanings)便成为了衡量当代艺术最重要的两个标准。这个标准的获得得到了美国美学家阿瑟·丹托的启迪,但是丹托的艺术定义对于中国仍是一种"理论霸权",他认定如果在东方与西方艺术之间的任何差异都不能成为艺术本质的组成部分。在全球化时代,当代的中国艺术在确立本土与全球的双重价值的时候,必须应对的来自西方艺术的理论与践行的挑战。 The misinterpretation of National Art Exhibition from Western critics is precisely due to the different "effective system of inheritance" functioning respectively in Chinese and western art. Consequently, the progression of western contemporary art come into being by constantly denying the inventiveness of its predecessors, while the mainstream of Chinese art still advocates the development through inheritance. It is precisely the different progressing mode of occidental and Chinese art, as well as the difference between Chinese antiquity and modernity. The critical standards of Chinese contemporary art firstly call for creativeness, that is to say, Chinese contemporary art is expected to take its root in tradition, meanwhile to deviate from it;Secondly, Chinese contemporary artworks are required to present composite meanings. Therefore, the so-called "creativity rooted in tradition" and "composite meanings" have become the two most essential standards to evaluate contemporary arts. The institution of the standard was inspired by the American aesthetician Arthur Danto, but Danto’s definition of art is still a kind of "theoretical supremacy" for China, and he believes that if any individuality between oriental and occidental art cannot constitute the essence of art. In the age of globalization, Chinese contemporary art has to meet the challenge of western art theory and practice when establishing the dual value of local and global.
作者 刘悦笛 Liu Yuedi
出处 《美术》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期19-23,共5页 Art Magazine
关键词 中西艺术 传承体系 创新 本根的创造性 意义的复合性 western and Chinese art system of heritance innovation creativity rooted in tradition composite meanings
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1Arthur C. Danto, Analytical Philosophy of Action, New York:Cambridge University Press, 1973.
  • 2Donald Davidson, "Danto' s Action", in Daniel Herwitz and Michael Kelly (eds.), Action, Art, History: Engagements with Arthur C. Danto, New York: Columbia University Press, 2007, pp. 6--16.
  • 3Arthur C. Danto, Analytical Philosophy of History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.
  • 4Arthur C. Danto, Analytical Philosophy of Knowledge, London: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
  • 5John Rajchman and Comell West (eds.), Post-Analytic Philosophy, New Yorkz Columbia University Press, 1985.
  • 6Nelson Goodman, Ways of Worldmaking, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1978.
  • 7Arthur C. Danto, Nietzsche as Philosopher, New York: Columbia University Press, 1965.
  • 8Arthur C. Danto, Sartre, London:Fontana Press, 1975.
  • 9Arthur C. Danto, Narration and Knowledge, New York:Columbia University Press, 1985.
  • 10Hayden White, Metahistory:The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.

共引文献8

同被引文献46

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部