有关学术期刊评价研究的几个关系问题

Several Relational Issues Related to Academic Journal Evaluation Research

评价学术期刊,虽同行专家定性评价是具有主导和决定作用的因素,但量化评价仍然是必不可少的重要基础。研讨学术期刊评价,首先有必要对涉及评价的定性与定量、学术标准与期刊影响力标准、学术期刊评价与学术评价、评价的科学性、合理性与可操作性、评价制度与评价伦理等5个关系问题做出准确的理解和把握。惟有以此为前提和基础,才有可能深化目前尚存分歧问题的研究,研制科学合理且具可操作性的评价方案、质量标准、指标体系及办法,不断提高学术期刊评价的科学性、权威性和公信力。

On the valuation of academic journals, although the qualitative evaluation of peer experts is a leading and decisive factor, quantitative evaluation is still an essential and important foundation. To discuss the evaluation of academic journals, it is necessary to make an accurate understanding and to, at first grasp five relations, namely: the relation between qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation;the relation between academic standards and influence standard of journals, the relation between academic journal evaluation and academic evaluation: the relation in scientific nature, rationality and the maneuverability of the evaluation;and the relation between the evaluation system and evaluation ethics. Only by taking this as a premise and basis is it possible to deepen the research on the existing divergent problems, develop scientific and reasonable evaluation schemes, quality standards, index systems and methods, and continuously improve the scientific nature, authority and credibility of academic journal evaluation.