期刊文献+

英语弱跨越结构中代词约束的眼动研究 被引量:1

An Eye-tracking Study of Pronominal Binding in English Weak Crossover
原文传递
导出
摘要 心理语言学界对代词加工存在两种不同的态度。句法优先说学派认为,代词在线加工严格受句法原则的制约,只有位于合法位置的先行词才能约束代词;基于线索的检索机制模型则认为,语言加工器受语义线索的影响,不合法位置上的先行词若在性别等语义特征上与代词匹配,代词仍可被约束。本研究采用眼动技术,对比了英语补语从句和弱跨越句中代词的在线加工模式,有以下发现:早期眼动指标显示,代词虽在补语从句中受合法先行词约束,但在弱跨越结构中则完全自由;不过,晚期眼动指标及整句阅读时长显示,代词在弱跨越结构中受不合法位置先行词的影响。该研究结果说明加工早期句法原则优先,但在加工晚期,线索检索机制仍可影响代词加工。 There are two competing accounts on processing of pronouns. The syntax-first hypothesis claims that the processing of pronouns is strictly governed by syntactic constraints. Pronouns can only be bound from grammatically licit positions. On the other hand, the cue-based retrieval model argues that the language parser capitalizes on semantic cues in online processing. A grammatically illicit antecedent can bind the pronoun if there is gender or number feature match. The present study used eye-tracking technique to investigate the processing patterns of pronouns in English complement clauses and the weak crossover constructions. Eye-tracking measures indicating early processing stage showed that pronouns were bound by c-commanding antecedents in complement clauses but must be free in the weak crossover configuration. However, a late-stage eye-tracking measure and sentence reading time suggest that pronoun processing can still be influenced by illicit antecedents that match in gender cues. The results suggest that syntactic constraints have primacy over cue-based retrieval at the early stage of processing but are defeasible during the later processing stage by cue-based retrieval.
作者 吕骏 Lyu Jun(Linguistics Department,University of Southern California,Los Angeles,CA,U.S.A.90089)
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期174-187,共14页 Modern Foreign Languages
关键词 代词约束 弱跨越 句法优先假说 基于线索的检索机制 pronominal binding weak crossover syntax-first hypothesis cue-based retrieval
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献40

  • 1潘海华,胡建华.汉语复合反身代词与英语反身代词比较研究[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(4):241-247. 被引量:31
  • 2高立群,刘兆静,黄月圆.“自己”是谁?——对约束原则的实验研究[J].语言科学,2005,4(2):39-50. 被引量:9
  • 3Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents [M]. London:Routledge.
  • 4Baayen, H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Baayen, H., D. Davidson & D. Bates. 2008. Mixed - effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390-412.
  • 6Badecker, W. & K. Straub. 2002. The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology 28(4): 748-769.
  • 7Baker, C. L. 1995. Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English [J]. Language 71: 63-101.
  • 8Battistella, E. & Y. H. Xu. 1990. Remarks on the reflexive in Chinese [J]. Linguistics 28(2): 205-240.
  • 9Benz,L.,L.J?ger,S.Vasishth&P.Hofmeister.2013.The use of non-structural cues in reflexive resolution:Evidence from eye-tracking[P].Poster presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.University of South Carolina,Columbia,SC.
  • 10Chen,Z.,L.J?ger&S.Vasishth.2012.How structure-sensitie is the parser?Evidence from Mandarin Chinese[A].In B.Stolterfoht&S.Featherston(eds.).Current Work in Linguistic Evidence:The Fourth Tübingen Meeting,Studies in Generative Grammar[C].Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.

共引文献6

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部