论国际规范秩序下国际经济法律体制的变革思路

On Reform of International Economic Legal System in Perspective of International Normative Order

由秩序存续的规范性内核所决定,当今国际秩序是国际法律体制规范塑造的结果。现行国际经济法律体制兼具规范性和功能性特征,自形成以来数百年的演进历程表明,其建构发展与解构挑战相伴相生、如影随形。究其根本,国际法律体制作为国际政治现实之映射,同时受到国际社会成员"无政府状态"的"平权"法律结构与大国的事实作用双重固有的制约,目前多边经济体制及其法治原则所面临的危机也根源于此。值当下现实主义强权政治高调回归,世界处百年未有之大变局,国际经济法律体制的变革既取决于国际社会权力结构的客观变化,也与国际法主体主观的目标、价值追求及由此所确定的行为选择息息相关。坚守"规则导向"的多边主义立场,在充分发挥国际法的约束性功能和矫正全球化发展中的周期性问题的同时,也正视大国霸权合法性、区域冒进的现实基础与利弊得失,以更加包容合作、理性务实的态度平衡多极诉求,既是国际社会,也是中国应当秉持的战略定位和行为选择。

Determined by its normative nature for orders, the present international order is the outcome of the international legal system. The current international economic law system is both norma-tive and functional. In its history of hundred years, the international economic law system has always been accompanied by constructive developments and de-constructive challenges. Reflec-ting the reality of international politics, the international law system is creating an international community with a legal structure of egalitarianism enjoyed by its anarchic international members and, on the other hand, the hegemony maintained by big powers in the world. And this ac-counts for the crisis encountered by the multilateral economic system and its rule of law princi-ple. Currently, with a high-profile return of the realistic power politics and the great changes unprecedented in the past hundred years, the reform of the international economic law system is not only decided by the objective changes of power structure of the international society, but al-so closely related to the subjective goals, values and measures to take thereof. Standing the ground of rule-based multilateralism, while giving full play to the binding function of interna-tional law and rectifying the cyclical problems in the development of globalization, we should also face up to the realistic basis and advantages and disadvantages of the legitimacy of power hegemony and regional rashness, and balance the multipolar demands with a more inclusive, cooperative, rational and pragmatic attitude. This is the strategic orientation and behavior choice not only for the international community but also for China to uphold.