期刊文献+

论全球金融治理体系的“多元一体”构建 被引量:3

On the Construction of“Diversity and Integration”in the Global Financial Governance Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全球金融利益分配与博弈是全球金融治理体系构建的核心,也是现行全球金融治理体系存在治理主体和治理法制碎片化、治理体制缺乏有效的国际协调与合作、国际金融组织的权责机制对发展中国家的不公平与不合理等弊端之根源。尽管新兴经济体为全球金融治理秩序的修复进行了一系列有益尝试,但区域性与辅助性的基本定位决定了其无法对现有全球金融治理体系形成实质性挑战。国际社会应树立“共同发展”的全球金融治理理念,凝聚已有治理机构和治理法制的长处,沿循国际政治与法律的路径,构建“多元一体”的全球金融治理体系。 The distribution and game of global financial interests is the core of the construction of a global financial governance mechanism,and it is also the root of the drawbacks of the existing global financial governance system,including the fragmentation of governance subjects and governance rule of law,lack of effective international mechanisms for governance coordination and cooperation,and the unfairness and irrationality of the power and responsibility mechanisms of international financial organizations for developing countries.Although emerging economies have made a series of useful attempts to rectify the global financial governance order,their basic regional and auxiliary positioning determines that they cannot present a substantive challenge to the existing global financial governance system.Therefore,the international community should establish the concept of“common development”for global financial governance,consolidate the strengths of the existing governance institutions and governance laws,and follow the path of international politics and law to build a global financial governance mechanism featuring“diversity and integration”.
作者 李国安 LI Guo-an(School of Law,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian)
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期118-126,共9页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金 福建省社会科学规划项目(省法学会专项)“金融科技的勃兴与监管科技运用的法律路径”(FJ2019TWFB05)。
关键词 全球利益博弈 “多元一体” 全球金融治理体系 global interest game “diversity and integration” global financial governance mechanism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献72

  • 1陈伟光,申丽娟.全球治理和全球经济治理的边界:一个比较分析框架[J].战略决策研究,2014,5(1):24-36. 被引量:4
  • 2马丁.休伊森,蒂莫西.辛克莱,张胜军.全球治理理论的兴起[J].马克思主义与现实,2002,54(1):43-50. 被引量:25
  • 3See Anti--Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, adopted on April 15th, 2011.
  • 4See European Commission, IPR Enforcement Report 2009, Commission of the European Communities, SEC (2009) 1360, Brussels, 2009, p. 5.
  • 5See USITC, China.. Effects of Intellectual Property Infringement and Indigenous Innovation Policies on the U. S. Economy, USITC, Investigation No. 332-519, Washington, DC. , 2011.
  • 6See China -- Measures Affecting the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights -- Report of the Panel, WT/ DS362/R, January 26, 2009.
  • 7Xuan Li, Ten General Misconceptions About the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, in Xuan Li, Carlos Maria Correa ed., Intellectual Property Enforcement: International Perspectives, Edward EIgar Publishing Limited, 2009, p. 14, p. 62.
  • 8See Office of the United States Trade Representative, Free Trade Agreements, http://WWW, ustr. gov/trade--agreements/free-- trade- agreements, 2011 - 07 - 15.
  • 9See The EU-- South Korea Free Trade Agreement, http://ee, europa, eu/trade/creating--opportunities/bilateral-- relations/coun- tries/korea/,2011- 07- 15.
  • 10Viviana Mu? oz Tellez, The Changing Global Governance of Intellectual Property Enforcement: A New Challenge for Developing Countries, in Xuan Li, Carlos Maria Correa ed. , Intellectual Property Enforcement: International Perspectives, Edward EIgar Publishing Limited, 2009, p. 10.

同被引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部